Books & the Arts
/
April 22, 2025
The tech firm has come to represent the continuing battle between America and China.
Advert Coverage
A Huawei retailer in Beijing, 2024.
(Kevin Frayer / Getty Photos)
America’s political and financial elites had been as soon as unruffled by the rise of China. Sure, Chinese language GDP was rising quick, and sure, China’s share of worldwide commerce was rising equally quickly. However this didn’t—or, a minimum of, didn’t appear to—problem America’s ongoing financial dominance. In any case, the greenback was nonetheless king. The dimensions and depth of China’s inventory market continued to be dwarfed by the US’. GDP per capita nonetheless weighed closely in America’s favor. And the acknowledged international heavyweights of Huge Tech—Alphabet, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft—had been American corporations every person. The essential posture vis-à-vis China was the next: You retain producing all that low cost stuff, we’ll carry on shopping for it, and you retain on financing the deficits that we accrue within the course of.
Books in evaluate
Home of Huawei: The Secret Historical past of China’s Most Highly effective Firm
by Eva Dou
Over the past decade, all of this has unraveled. Throughout his first time period within the White Home, Donald Trump launched a collection of tariffs on Chinese language imports, which sparked retaliatory measures from China and rising discuss of a “commerce warfare.” Beneath Joe Biden, the inflammatory language of the Trump 1.0 period grew to become much less conspicuous. Slightly, in a break with the hegemony of neoliberalism, the Biden White Home hailed a renaissance in “industrial coverage”; his flacks talked about not having the ability to depend on market mechanisms to information funding. However even when the tone had modified, the coverage content material was not a lot totally different: China was within the crosshairs. If something, Biden’s China tariffs had been extra extreme than these he inherited. In mid-2024, tariffs on Chinese language metal and aluminum had been raised to 25 %, on photo voltaic cells and panels to 50 %, on electrical automobiles to one hundred pc; and in a parting present to his successor, in January 2025, simply as Biden was leaving workplace, a 50 % tariff on Chinese language semiconductors went into impact.
Notably, inexperienced expertise was on the coronary heart of Biden’s commerce and China coverage. In explaining his tariff hikes and their sectoral focus, the Biden staff repeatedly invoked the local weather disaster and the power transition, arguing that the one profitable and sustainable international transition could be one the place inexperienced applied sciences weren’t monopolized by a single nation. US officers had been properly conscious that monopolization was one thing that China was shut to truly reaching. By 2023, China managed the manufacturing of round 90 % of the world’s rare-earth components utilized in clean-energy merchandise and a minimum of 80 % of the worldwide solar-panel provide chain, with solely barely decrease shares in wind generators and EV batteries. Washington additionally regarded with one thing like awe at China’s build-out of photo voltaic and wind energy: The 12 months after Biden’s historic “local weather invoice,” the Inflation Discount Act of 2022, was handed to nice home fanfare, China put in 10 instances as a lot web new renewable capability as America did.
Beneath Trump 2.0, all emphasis on inexperienced expertise has in fact been buried (a minimum of rhetorically, because the tariffs on China’s inexperienced tech had been retained). However the tariff saber-rattling has nonetheless escalated into all-out commerce warfare. In February, a ten % tariff was imposed on Chinese language imports throughout the board, and in March, this was elevated to twenty %. Trump was simply getting began, nevertheless: April 2, his “Liberation Day,” noticed the blanket tariff fee on China raised to 54 %; and on the time of this writing, after retaliatory Chinese language measures, the US tariff fee on Chinese language imports successfully totals 145 %. What’s more and more clear is that after many years of cautious sparring, the rivalry between America and China—because the US regards it, at any fee—has turn into a battle for international financial supremacy. Definitely, the Trump administration has focused many different international locations too, however China is plainly the primary antagonist. Not for nothing has the Chinese language authorities accused the US of “unilateral bullying.”
What can also be clear, although, is that beneath America’s bluster lurks a really actual and really comprehensible worry: specifically, that it is a battle that America won’t win. In actual fact, greater than that, it is a battle that America may need already misplaced; all of the joking on social media that the US has entered its personal “Century of Humiliation”— China’s lasted from the mid-Nineteenth to the mid-Twentieth century—cuts to the fast exactly as a result of it expresses very actual anxieties.
If one firm symbolizes the continuing battle between America and China, that firm, arguably, is Huawei. In its early years, after it was based in 1987, Huawei—a Chinese language tech agency that focuses on telecommunications—was largely ignored within the US, to the extent that it was even acknowledged. Within the 2000s and early 2010s, as the corporate grew and expanded, together with in the US itself, American enterprise and coverage elites typically tolerated Huawei, perceiving it, at worst, as an irritant. However since Trump’s first time period as president, a brand new period has begun. Endlessly challenged and vitriolically attacked, Huawei has ascended to the standing of Public Enemy No. 1, the very apotheosis of the Chinese language “risk.”
Present Situation
So why is Huawei handled with such hostility by US policymakers? Partly it’s about geopolitics. Although Huawei is an more and more diversified enterprise, its principal enterprise, producing over half of whole income, is the design, manufacture, and sale of telecom gear resembling networking infrastructure and the supply of ancillary companies. Communications networks, in fact, are integral to the methods through which states eavesdrop and spy on each other. America’s worry is that Huawei may or already does enable its merchandise for use to nefarious ends by the Chinese language authorities. Ergo, it’s deemed a risk to US nationwide safety.
It’s with this side of Huawei’s position in US-China relations that Eva Dou, a reporter for The Washington Put up, is principally involved in her new guide, Home of Huawei: The Secret Historical past of China’s Most Highly effective Firm. It has by no means been a secret that Huawei’s applied sciences are extensively embedded within the up to date surveillance state. The corporate has, as an example, been a serious participant because the 2000s within the worldwide marketplace for the chips utilized in surveillance cameras; Huawei was certainly one of eight corporations chosen by Beijing in 1996 for a $1 billion nationwide semiconductor growth program. In China itself, what proved an particularly profitable alternative for Huawei was President Xi Jinping’s launch in 2015 of a program—dubbed “Sharp Eyes”—aimed, Dou writes, at “blanketing the nation with a community of safety cameras.” In 2020, it was introduced that China’s capital had no extra blind spots: “Digital eyes had been watching over one hundred pc of Beijing.” The identical 12 months, the Put up revealed that Huawei had knowingly countenanced using its expertise to trace members of the Uyghur ethnic minority, prompting the French soccer star Antoine Griezmann to terminate his sponsorship cope with the corporate.
Whereas the Uyghur revelations actually hardened what by that time was a rising US-led worldwide flip towards Huawei, policymakers in America and different Western markets have all the time been rather more involved in regards to the security-related and political implications of Huawei’s presence in their very own territories. May Huawei’s gear be hacked, resulting in community disruption? May the Chinese language authorities eavesdrop on worldwide community customers? From the American perspective, the biographic particulars of Huawei’s legendary founder and CEO, Ren Zhengfei—a background within the navy (the Engineering Corps) and a member of the Chinese language Communist Occasion since 1978—solely redoubled the grounds for suspicion.
“With Huawei more and more built-in into international networks,” Dou writes of developments within the mid-2000s, “it was being watched carefully by spy companies.” Statements alongside these strains pepper the guide; by the top, the reader could surprise why Dou spends fairly a lot time on the cloak-and-dagger stuff, on condition that she by no means does unearth a smoking gun of any variety. Nonetheless, she is kind of proper to focus on the staggering hypocrisy of the US authorities’s ethical grandstanding about alleged Chinese language espionage machinations. Because the 2013–14 Snowden leaks demonstrated, America’s personal Nationwide Safety Company had efficiently infiltrated Huawei a number of years beforehand and was utilizing its infrastructure to spy not simply on the corporate however on a spread of different public- and private-sector entities, each in China and around the globe. “The irony,” as Huawei’s US spokesman, William Plummer, put it on the time, “is that precisely what they’re doing to us is what they’ve all the time charged that the Chinese language are doing by means of us.” No surprise, remarks Dou, that Washington had been “so assured that Beijing may use Huawei’s gear for snooping: the NSA had been doing precisely that for years.”
For all the safety issues, nevertheless, the truth that Huawei is considered such a risk has to do with rather more than “simply” geopolitics. Equally necessary, and maybe even extra so, is the brute truth of Huawei’s staggering industrial success. One suspects that, consciously or in any other case, nervousness about Huawei’s aggressive accomplishments is typically dressed up as a priority with “security”: Far simpler for the American thoughts to invoke a surveillance bogeyman than to confess to trepidatious reverence at Chinese language enterprise prowess.
As late because the flip of the millennium, the worldwide telecommunications {hardware} market—Huawei’s dwelling turf—continued to be dominated by Western corporations resembling Alcatel, Ericsson, Lucent, and Nortel. However the first decade of the brand new millennium started to see a altering of the guard. A seminal second, as Dou tells it, got here with Huawei’s first main breakthrough within the West, when, in 2005, the corporate received a profitable bid to improve the community of BT, Britain’s largest provider of telephony companies. Opening the door to, amongst others, the French and Spanish markets, the BT deal was the “starting of the top for a number of of Huawei’s Western rivals,” who merely couldn’t compete with the corporate at its “funds value factors.” By 2012, Huawei was the world’s largest vendor of telecommunications networking {hardware}. Having additionally efficiently made the transfer into client electronics—branded family devices “may assist Huawei soften its picture abroad,” Dou notes—the Chinese language agency was, for good measure, now the world’s third-largest smartphone maker, behind solely Apple and Samsung.
Advert Coverage
Standard
“swipe left beneath to view extra authors”Swipe →
Huawei has succeeded internationally regardless of America’s greatest efforts, particularly previously decade, to stop it from doing so. The corporate had been on Washington’s radar because the late Nineties, not least due to its enlargement in these years into markets presided over by what the US deemed “rogue” regimes, amongst them Iraq and Russia. The outcome was that, even after Huawei efficiently made large gross sales in different Western territories after establishing its foothold in Britain, America would stay the one main market through which it did not make important inroads, having to fulfill itself there with gross sales to second- or third-tier community operators. As a possible provider, the Chinese language firm was merely past the pale for America’s telephony market leaders, for whom political optics and relationships are thought of simply as necessary as capital prices and community high quality.
In the course of the first Trump administration, the US expanded its marketing campaign towards Huawei on two new fronts. It imposed export controls, particularly by banning US corporations from supplying Huawei with crucial elements, as they’d been doing since as early as 1993, when Huawei established its first US subsidiary in California. And, with some notable successes, the US authorities additionally started making use of substantial strain on international locations like Australia, Britain, and Canada to comply with its lead in blackballing Huawei of their home markets, specializing in these international locations’ tendering of contracts to construct 5G networks. Huawei, nevertheless, has prevailed nonetheless, whilst there is no such thing as a doubt that America’s resistance has crimped the scope of its achievements. “The West was persevering with to develop extra inhospitable towards Huawei,” Dou says by the use of bringing her story as much as the time of her writing, in 2024. “But—virtually extremely—Huawei was nonetheless primary on the planet in 5G gear gross sales.”
Huawei’s prevailing within the face of the US’ concerted opposition exhibits that America just isn’t as highly effective or persuasive because it actually likes to think about that it’s: Not everybody, even its (erstwhile) “mates,” kowtows to its calls for. Moreover, and maybe extra considerably nonetheless, the Huawei story demonstrates that within the twenty first century, non-Western corporations are in a position to be huge industrial successes—to be, actually, world leaders of their chosen business sectors—whereas having the US and several other different main Western markets basically closed off to them. That, in itself, is a profound assertion on the shifting of the world financial order, and one which Trump and his cronies evidently appear to be ignoring—or maybe are unable to know—as they set about alienating long-time industrial and political allies, along with the record of long-time adversaries, by unleashing an all-encompassing commerce warfare the likes of which the world has not seen because the early Twentieth century. Within the postwar period, it could have been unthinkable that an organization may have ascended to international market management in any space of the financial system and not using a main presence in the US, Europe, or (extra possible) each. That’s not true. Alongside East Asia and Africa, it’s the Center East, with all its natural-resource-based riches, that represents, in Dou’s phrases, “the beating coronary heart of Huawei’s international empire.”
What can also be maddening to Huawei’s American critics is that it has carried out all this whereas thumbing its nostril at American-style capitalism. For a few years, there was widespread expectation around the globe, and amongst many in China itself, that Huawei would proceed to an IPO. This was assumed to be its “pure” evolutionary terminus, the inevitable results of the corporate’s inculcating, and finally adopting, the Western gospel of shareholder worth. However Huawei by no means did turn into a public firm, and it by no means prioritized shareholder worth to the exclusion of all else. It was, and is, one thing else fully—and that one thing else has proved an awesome industrial success. What do we all know in regards to the mannequin?
Huawei started life as a contract producer. That’s, at the beginning, it didn’t have its personal merchandise, however manufactured these of others—together with, most notably, easy analog phone switches able to routing and connecting, at most, a number of dozen telephone calls, which had been offered to the likes of small places of work and motels. Huawei was initially a personal firm, managed prime to backside by Ren Zhengfei himself and capitalized with the princely sum of 21,000 yuan offered by Ren and 5 personal traders. 5 years after its founding, by which era it had developed and begun to promote a primary change of its personal (the BH-03), Huawei transformed in 1992 to a “collectively owned enterprise,” an organization construction that furnished each a level of political patronage and a set of broader financing alternatives—and which, in Huawei’s case, appeared to ivolve a extra democratic type of administration within the form, particularly, of a robust staff’ committee.
A stimulus for additional change got here in 1994, a landmark 12 months for China’s company panorama, when the nation’s new Firm Regulation launched limited-liability corporations (LLCs) with the goals of encouraging larger funding, aligning China’s company governance with worldwide requirements, and facilitating an accelerated transition to a market financial system. Ren was intrigued however not instantly satisfied, electing to rent a staff of Beijing enterprise professors to assist him strategize restructuring alternatives and map out a brand new future for the agency. Huawei did turn into an LLC (and stays one right now), however solely in 1997, at which level the prevailing worker shareholdings, of which there have been a big quantity, had been consolidated right into a single “commerce union” holding. In the meantime, the professors’ much-anticipated blueprint, the “Huawei Fundamental Regulation,” was adopted the next 12 months. Revenue could be only one goal amongst many; extra necessary was the reinvestment of that revenue to drive development—totally 10 % of gross sales had been to enter R&D.
Dou argues that Huawei is in the end greatest understood as an organization made within the picture of the nation. Its objective is to not improve shareholder worth a lot as “to make sure its personal long-term survival,” as can also be true, she factors out, of the ruling Communist Occasion. The key of Huawei’s success, Dou writes, is its “means to perform titanic duties at virtually inconceivable speeds by getting everybody to tug in unison.” Studying these phrases, one can’t assist however assume, but once more, of China’s titanic ongoing achievements in rolling out renewable power capability on a gargantuan scale and at virtually inconceivable speeds.
However Dou can also be forthright in regards to the appreciable downsides of this enterprise method. Success achieved within the method of Huawei, she observes, “can come at crushing prices for the people concerned.” Huawei “fetishized lengthy work hours”—the corporate’s engineers had been accustomed to preserving mats by their desks so they may nap on the ground fairly than going dwelling at night time. Maybe worse was that an aggressive, survival-of-the-fittest “wolf tradition” was inspired not simply externally, within the rivalry with opponents, however internally, amongst colleagues. And it certainly didn’t assist staff’ psychological well being to know that the prospect of involuntary redundancy always hovered within the background: Huawei, Dou notes, “repeatedly pressured its employees into mass resignations.”
In any case, sufficient is understood in regards to the psychological results to go away the reader in little question in regards to the sheer corrosiveness of the Huawei mannequin from a social perspective. Dou stories a “string of ‘unnatural’ deaths,” together with suicides, amongst staff. She additionally cites the discovering of a scholarly research that some two-thirds of Huawei’s senior administration had been affected by a stress-related sickness. Such figures trace at a milieu beside which even Wall Avenue’s famously pitiless working tradition would possible look positively tranquil.
Huawei is a creature of Shenzhen, a metropolis within the coastal province of Guangdong in South China. After the decommissioning of his navy unit, the Engineering Corps, a thirtysomething Ren Zhengfei moved to Shenzhen within the early Eighties, initially assigned a job there at a subsidiary of the state-owned South Sea Oil Company, which was constructing a harbor to assist offshore oil manufacturing. Following a “quick and undistinguished” time on this place, Ren—who had made one thing of a reputation for himself within the navy by constructing a precision air-pressure generator that he subsequently labored to commercialize—established Huawei. He was 42. He’s nonetheless the corporate’s CEO right now.
It’s potential, even perhaps possible, that Huawei couldn’t have turn into what it did besides in Shenzhen. Abutting Hong Kong to its quick south, Shenzhen was designated as China’s first-ever “particular financial zone” in 1980. On the time, it had a inhabitants of round 30,000. Bodily walled off from the remainder of China by barbed-wire fences, it was additionally walled off figuratively: Whereas the post-Mao reformism of Deng Xiaoping initially proceeded slowly within the nation at massive, every thing was on quick ahead within the “wild west” that was late-Twentieth-century Shenzhen, the place the traditional guidelines didn’t apply and an “something goes” method prevailed. The town was “floor zero,” Dou writes, for China’s “grand experiment with capitalism.” Ren and Huawei exploited this enterprise setting maximally, as did many others. Within the Eighties by means of the 2010s, Shenzhen was one of many fastest-growing cities on the planet: By 2020, its 30,000 inhabitants had turn into 17.4 million, making town by then China’s third-largest.
In fact, the Chinese language “capitalism” with which Ren and others experimented in booming Shenzhen was and is a really particular model, and Dou does an exquisite job of picturing its sheer foreignness and oddness, when seen by means of Western eyes. In no respect, maybe, is the foreignness of Chinese language capitalism extra placing than when it comes to the relation between corporations and the Chinese language Communist Occasion. All corporations with a sure proportion of staff who’re get together members are required to determine an inner get together “committee” that offers the CCP a proper position within the firm. Huawei arrange its committee in 1996, with Ren himself serving as the primary secretary. Huawei’s committee infused the corporate with the CCP’s signature themes of “patriotism, battle for the larger trigger, and self-sacrifice”—little question the mats by the engineers’ desks and the surging psychological well being issues had been justified accordingly—and its affect seems solely to have grown with time. In 2007, the committee was granted veto energy over Huawei’s govt appointments.
Certainly, as Western observers have by no means uninterested in remarking, Huawei’s fortunes had been sure up with the get together, and with the state extra typically, from the beginning. The error that these observers have made, nevertheless, is to consider the Chinese language state primarily, and generally solely, when it comes to Beijing, which is to say the central authorities. To take action, Dou exhibits us, is to overlook some of the necessary elements of the Huawei story.
The precise merchandise that had been key to creating Huawei a serious industrial drive each nationally and internationally had been digital phone switches. Capable of route and join hundreds (and even hundreds of thousands) of calls without delay in contrast with the mere dozens dealt with by analog variations, digital switches represent the nerve facilities of recent public communications networks, directing and managing the stream of knowledge in addition to voice packets. When Huawei started working within the early Nineties on the event of digital switches, that work was financed by a joint-venture firm known as Mobeco, established in 1993. The cash behind Mobeco was offered by Huawei’s fairness companions within the enterprise—specifically, 17 provincial and municipal (that’s, public) telecom bureaus.
When Huawei’s first proprietary digital change (C&C08) went into manufacturing in 1995, the identical public telecom bureaus that had helped finance its growth had been now answerable for shopping for it for his or her native phone exchanges. Not solely that, however, not directly a minimum of, in addition they discovered themselves manufacturing it: Huawei outsourced the manufacturing of C&C08 to Mobeco. In brief, what Western observers may perceive as conflicts of curiosity abounded. And Huawei then doubled down, because the success of Mobeco prompted it to broaden the mannequin: It arrange extra such joint ventures with native governments across the nation. Dou characterizes these as “Huawei’s ‘marriage’ to the state.” This isn’t to say that Huawei didn’t have shut and efficacious relationships with different arms of the state—for instance, “in 2005,” Dou writes, “the China Growth Financial institution, a Beijing-controlled coverage financial institution, allotted a whopping $10 billion to fund Huawei’s abroad enlargement.”
Regardless of documenting these varied linkages between the corporate and the state, that is additionally, paradoxically, the place Home of Huawei is at its weakest. As Dou observes, amid the Nineties ferment of productive innovation in China, Huawei was certainly one of 4 main home producers of telecom gear to return to the fore, the others being Datang, Nice Dragon, and ZTE. Why, out of those 4, did Huawei emerge because the undisputed chief each domestically and, in the end, internationally? Dou doesn’t—and arguably can’t—reply that query, as a result of regardless of hinting that Huawei received just by advantage of outcompeting its rivals, she by no means really will get on the query of what “competitors” means within the context of Chinese language capitalism, saturated as that system is in political affect.
Students, nevertheless, have been exploring this query. The sociologist Kyle Chan, as an example, has examined the character of competitors in sectors of the Chinese language financial system through which state-owned enterprises (SOEs) play a big position. His analysis is very related to the case at hand: Datang, Nice Dragon, and ZTE are all owned wholly or primarily by the state. Chan discovered that industries with a considerable SOE presence, telecommunications included, are characterised by what he calls “managed competitors,” representing a mix of state oversight and aggressive forces and mixing innovation and effectivity, on the one hand, with management and planning on the opposite. With the intention to preserve a steadiness of aggressive capabilities amongst business actors and thus stop the formation of monopolies, the state intervenes the place mandatory, Chan argues, to redistribute assets, personnel, and contracts.
There may be little or no evaluation of this type in Home of Huawei. Dou has written a guide that’s rather more eager about personalities, subterfuge, and geopolitics than it’s in economics and aggressive observe. She helps us perceive why Huawei vaulted to the highest of US policymakers’ fearful protectionist agenda, however much less about how and why it vaulted to the highest of the telecommunications business towards each nationwide and worldwide opponents. We’re left with a lot nonetheless to know about Huawei as a selected company embodiment of what’s, within the Chinese language case, a really explicit kind of capitalist social formation.
The chaos and cruelty of the Trump administration reaches new lows every week.
Trump’s catastrophic “Liberation Day” has wreaked havoc on the world financial system and arrange yet one more constitutional disaster at dwelling. Plainclothes officers proceed to abduct college college students off the streets. So-called “enemy aliens” are flown overseas to a mega jail towards the orders of the courts. And Signalgate guarantees to be the primary of many incompetence scandals that expose the brutal violence on the core of the American empire.
At a time when elite universities, highly effective legislation corporations, and influential media shops are capitulating to Trump’s intimidation, The Nation is extra decided than ever earlier than to carry the highly effective to account.
In simply the final month, we’ve revealed reporting on how Trump outsources his mass deportation agenda to different international locations, uncovered the administration’s enchantment to obscure legal guidelines to hold out its repressive agenda, and amplified the voices of courageous pupil activists focused by universities.
We additionally proceed to inform the tales of those that combat again towards Trump and Musk, whether or not on the streets in rising protest actions, on the town halls throughout the nation, or in crucial state elections—like Wisconsin’s current state Supreme Court docket race—that present a mannequin for resisting Trumpism and show that Musk can’t purchase our democracy.
That is the journalism that issues in 2025. However we are able to’t do that with out you. As a reader-supported publication, we depend on the assist of beneficiant donors. Please, assist make our important unbiased journalism potential with a donation right now.
In solidarity,
The Editors
The Nation
Brett Christophers
Brett Christophers is a professor of human geography at Uppsala College’s Institute for Housing and City Analysis. He’s most lately the writer of The Value is Improper: Why Capitalism Will not Save the Planet.
Extra from The Nation
Two works—a brand new movie, The Shrouds, and a career-spanning monograph by the movie critic Violet Lucca—current a extra sanguine picture of the grasp of physique horror.
Books & the Arts
/
John Semley
We spoke with the scholar about Black in Blues, a poetic exploration of the connection between the colour blue and Black folks.
Q&A
/
Elias Rodriques
