President Trump’s order that may finish automated citizenship for the youngsters of many classes of immigrants has been blocked from going into impact by three separate federal judges. These injunctions have been upheld by three separate appeals courts.
So Thursday’s case on the Supreme Courtroom was actually about two questions: Whether or not the structure ensures birthright citizenship and whether or not judges can situation nationwide injunctions in opposition to federal insurance policies.
College of Virginia regulation professor Amanda Frost, creator of the e book You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamersadopted the arguments and breaks down clues that time to the Justices’ pondering.
For sponsor-free episodes of Contemplate This, join Contemplate This+ by way of Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.
E-mail us at considerthis@npr.org.
Olga Urbina and her son Ares Webster take part in a protest exterior the Supreme Courtroom because it hears arguments about President Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship for a lot of classes of immigrants.
Drew Angerer/AFP by way of Getty Photographs
conceal caption
toggle caption
Drew Angerer/AFP by way of Getty Photographs
Olga Urbina and her son Ares Webster take part in a protest exterior the Supreme Courtroom because it hears arguments about President Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship for a lot of classes of immigrants.
Drew Angerer/AFP by way of Getty Photographs
This episode was produced by Michael Levitt and Connor Donevan with audio engineering by Hannah Gluvna. It was edited by Tinbete Ermyas. Our govt producer is Sami Yenigun.
