Saturday, June 28, 2025
Google search engine
HomeNewsCanada NewsAttraction dismissed in Canadian ‘leveraged donation scheme’

Attraction dismissed in Canadian ‘leveraged donation scheme’


Breadcrumb Path Hyperlinks

Newscanada

If one thing is ‘too good to be true … it invariably is,’ the choose warned

Printed Apr 02, 2025  •  4 minute learn

It can save you this text by registering at no cost right here. Or sign-in in case you have an account.

“Usually, a tax shelter quantity is much less of a gold star and extra of a crimson flag for the CRA,” the choose mentioned in his ruling. Photograph by Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

Article content material

The Tax Courtroom of Canada has issued a set of public warnings in a case involving a “leveraged donation scheme” the place potential donors had been lured with guarantees that their tax breaks would eclipse their contributions, however in actuality they ended up ineligible for charitable donation tax credit.

“Keep away from quick speaking, clean ‘individuals of commerce’ selling charitable donation ‘packages’ who might omit the very fact they’re being paid to advertise this system,” Justice Randall Bocock wrote in a latest choice out of Ottawa.

Commercial 2

This commercial has not loaded but, however your article continues beneath.

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS

Benefit from the newest native, nationwide and worldwide information.

Unique articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, particular version NP Platformed and First Studying newsletters and digital occasions.Limitless on-line entry to Nationwide Submit.Nationwide Submit ePaper, an digital reproduction of the print version to view on any gadget, share and touch upon.Each day puzzles together with the New York Instances Crossword.Assist native journalism.

SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES

Benefit from the newest native, nationwide and worldwide information.

Unique articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, particular version NP Platformed and First Studying newsletters and digital occasions.Limitless on-line entry to Nationwide Submit.Nationwide Submit ePaper, an digital reproduction of the print version to view on any gadget, share and touch upon.Each day puzzles together with the New York Instances Crossword.Assist native journalism.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign up to proceed together with your studying expertise.

Entry articles from throughout Canada with one account.Share your ideas and be part of the dialog within the feedback.Take pleasure in further articles per 30 days.Get electronic mail updates out of your favorite authors.

THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign up to proceed together with your studying expertise.

Entry articles from throughout Canada with one accountShare your ideas and be part of the dialog within the commentsEnjoy further articles per monthGet electronic mail updates out of your favorite authors

Article content material

The case entails a household’s unsuccessful attraction of a choice denying them tax breaks for contributions to the International Studying and Gifting Initiative, often known as GLGI.

“GLGI possible competes for the title of most litigated charitable donation program/initiative/scheme/sham (relying on one’s perspective) earlier than the Tax Courtroom,” Bocock mentioned. “This system’s longevity is notable as properly; the seminal lead case regarding GLGI was heard and determined a decade in the past.”

Within the latest choice, the choose dismissed Barry, Barbara and Brandon Malone’s attraction of a Canada Income Company choice that nixed hundreds of {dollars}’ price of donations claimed of their 2006, 2010, 2011 and 2012 taxation years as “ineligible” as a result of they “didn’t have donative intent, at regulation, to make a charitable reward.”

Keep away from quick speaking, clean ‘individuals of commerce’ selling charitable donation ‘packages’

Bocock defined how GLGI donations labored in his choice dated March 27.

The method concerned “GLGI’s offshore firm, Phoenix Studying Company (buying) software program licences consisting of a number of courseware titles at nominal worth from a Florida company, Infosource Inc.; Phoenix then gifted a lot of the licences to a Canadian belief, International Studying Belief 2004,” Bocock mentioned.

Posted

NP Posted

Thanks for signing up!

Article content material

Commercial 3

This commercial has not loaded but, however your article continues beneath.

Article content material

After writing a cheque to an related charity named Millenium, members had been “accepted as a capital beneficiary of the belief.”

After the cheque was cashed, “the belief, in flip, gave the taxpayer rights to schooling software program licences to plenty of licences proportional to the taxpayer’s money donation,” mentioned the choose.

The individual with the taxpayer rights then donated these licences to one among a number of different collaborating charities, and was issued tax receipts for each the unique money donation and the “theoretically apprised market-value” of the software program licences.

“Because of the money donation and the in-kind donation of licences, the taxpayer acquired donation receipts for a number of occasions the quantity donated, resulting in a charitable tax credit score that was a lot increased than the preliminary money donation,” the choose wrote.

Within the case of the Malone household, they donated software program licenses to Malvern Rouge Valley Youth Providers, a Toronto-area group. The Canada Income Company revoked Malvern Rouge’s charitable standing in November 2011 after an audit revealed “that the group had devoted a good portion of its assets to the promotion of the International Studying Gifting Initiative tax shelter gifting association.”

Commercial 4

This commercial has not loaded but, however your article continues beneath.

Article content material

For the interval from Might 1, 2008, to April 30, 2009, Malvern Rouge “acquired in extra of $17 million of money. Of this quantity, over $8.3 million was acquired as tax-receipted donations from the members of a tax shelter,” the company mentioned on the time. “The group acquired an extra $8.7 million from one other registered charity collaborating within the tax shelter. Our audit confirmed that of the roughly $17 million of money acquired, the group paid over $14 million to the promoters of the tax shelter.”

Beneficial from Editorial

Toronto Blue Jays catcher Russell Martin (right) and Josh Donaldson in Toronto on July 6, 2017.

CRA appeals former Blue Jays’ courtroom win in multi-million-dollar tax battle

The Canada Revenue Agency headquarters in Ottawa.

Canadian Jewish charity stripped of standing fights CRA over potential large tax invoice

Barry Malone argued that he, his partner, Barbara, and his son, Brandon, “had donative intent. They supposed to complement the lives of deprived Canadians by means of charitable giving.”

However the choose wasn’t shopping for it.

“The Malones be part of the ranks of tons of, even hundreds of GLGI members, stripped of their money, denied their inflated ‘charitable donation quantities’ as a result of the presents weren’t charitable and, due to this fact, not eligible for the promised charitable deductions,” Bocock mentioned. “They now face arrears of debt comprised of tax and curiosity arrears … That is most unlucky.”

Commercial 5

This commercial has not loaded but, however your article continues beneath.

Article content material

In 2020, attorneys advancing a category motion case towards CLGI mentioned that “as many as 50,000-60,000 Canadians participated on this charitable donation tax scheme, and paid in extra of $500,000,000 in what they thought had been charitable donations.”

If one thing is “too good to be true … it invariably is,” Bocock mentioned in his latest choice.

He cautioned that “if one good points one thing greater than a charitable receipt equal to (and never larger than) the worth of the money and/or correctly valued gift-in-kind, then the transferred property shouldn’t be a charitable reward, at regulation, and doesn’t qualify … as an eligible charitable deduction.”

If a donor is “requested to signal an Info Sheet, Deed of Present, Deed of Present of Property, Route One, Route Two, Utility and Waiver, there are lots of authorized outcomes, one among which is probably going not that of a professional charitable reward warranting an eligible charitable tax receipt,” mentioned the choose.

“Usually, a tax shelter quantity is much less of a gold star and extra of a crimson flag for the CRA.”

Our web site is the place for the most recent breaking information, unique scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and join our each day e-newsletter, Posted, right here.

Article content material

Share this text in your social community



Supply hyperlink

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments