In his first 100 days in workplace President Donald Trump has signed simply 5 payments into legislation whereas issuing over 100 govt actions, a sample that matches together with his imaginative and prescient of a extra highly effective govt.
Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Photographs/Getty Photographs North America
cover caption
toggle caption
Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Photographs/Getty Photographs North America
If Trump has adopted the Silicon Valley ethos of “transfer quick and break issues” for his second time period, then “transfer gradual and get out of the way in which” may very well be the corresponding marching orders on Capitol Hill.
President Trump has taken about govt actions in his first 100 days in workplace — a fast tempo that rivals the 162 actions President Biden took in his complete time in workplace.
Contemplate in the identical time frame, Congress has enacted simply 5 legal guidelinesa low watermark in trendy congressional historical past for this time interval.
To a big extent, Trump is having fun with the spoils of unilateral get together management of Washington, the place there was no vital push again as he legislates by means of govt actions on every part from immigration to election legislation, ignores statutes that require the White Home to tell the Senate on sure actions earlier than taking them, upends the economic system with tariffs that Congress may technically block and, most notably, allowed billionaire Elon Musk to steer a authorities “division” — with out affirmation hearings earlier than the Senate — that has unilaterally slashed and lower companies and applications funded by Congress by means of its constitutional authority to find out how taxpayer {dollars} get spent.
In a testomony to the energy of Trump’s get together loyalty, GOP leaders have taken little subject with it.
“I believe there is a gross overreaction within the media to what’s taking place,” Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., informed reporters earlier this 12 months when requested whether or not Musk’s authorities slashing efforts have been trampling on congressional turf.
Johnson has stated the president has the authority to verify {dollars} within the govt companies are properly spent. “It appears radical, it isn’t. I name it stewardship.”
However there are alerts that each one will not be properly with some in Congress.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, made a shocking admission at an occasion in Anchorage over the last congressional recess.
“We’re all afraid,” she informed constituents. “It is fairly a press release, however we’re in a time and a spot the place I actually haven’t been earlier than, and I will inform ya, I am oftentimes very anxious myself about utilizing my voice, as a result of retaliation is actual. And that is not proper.”
Meet The New Congress, Similar As The Previous Congress
Trump did not begin this, stated Professor Joseph Postell, an affiliate professor of politics at Hillsdale Faculty, however he’s benefitting from it.
“Congress has for many years type of ceded its authority, together with authority over fiscal issues, appropriations, budgets, issues like that,” he informed NPR, “I believe it is an enormous concern on this Congress, the extent to which Trump has been capable of lead the Congress on fiscal questions, however I additionally do not assume that is out of retaining with the way in which Congress has carried out or carried out itself over the previous couple of a long time.”
Congress is designed to be a co-equal department of presidency and a verify on govt energy, however in apply when the identical get together controls the White Home, lawmakers within the trendy period have confirmed prepared to go together with the usurpation of their legislative energy.
The dynamic applies to each events — like when Democrats cheered President Biden’s govt actions to create a pupil mortgage forgiveness program, which the Supreme Courtroom later dominated unconstitutional.
It was this fertile floor that has allowed Musk’s workforce to institute cuts throughout departments, companies, and applications with little pushback from the GOP-led Congress.
Congressional students like Postell say a authorities that capabilities like it is a trigger for concern. “I see the decline of a Congress that legislates as a severe constitutional disaster that anyone who believes in republican authorities must be involved about. So I have a tendency to not see this as only a impartial change. I see it as a severe constitutional concern.”
Present Them The Cash
Lawmakers additionally have to resolve how they will approve the spending payments for fiscal 12 months 2026 — which begins Oct. 1 — after punting on this 12 months’s payments.
Kevin Kosar, a congressional scholar with the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, stated it was comprehensible for Congress to need to clear the decks initially of this Congress, however the true take a look at of congressional muscle below Trump can be how they deal with subsequent 12 months’s spending payments.
“The affected person we all know as Congress, I don’t assume is wholly useless,” Kosar stated, including that Home and Senate lawmakers will need some assurances that the cash is definitely going to be spent as a result of in any other case it is a futile course of. “I might assume, in the end, the appropriators’ want for energy would kick in. I imply, it is going to need to kick in sooner or later. In any other case what is the level of being an appropriator?” Kosar stated.
Sarah Binder, a congressional scholar with the centrist Brookings Establishment, agrees. “You do not need to overuse the phrase, however it’s type of existential for Congress,” she stated, “It is actually arduous to get across the single most vital energy that Congress has as the ability of the purse, and if the events cannot make certain that the administration goes to abide by these pots of cash that they set in to statute, that they put into legislation, then the jig is up, proper?”
Kosar additionally nodded to the political actuality of the second, the place the Home GOP majority is on the road in 2026. Traditionally, the get together in energy within the White Home tends to lose seats within the midterms. Republicans maintain a slim two-seat majority.
“I do really feel just like the administration and congressional Republicans, to a level, actually are working inside a two 12 months window, and so the quantity of deference that legislators are displaying is to some extent, like, ‘we simply have to do that to see if we will rack up as many wins as potential, as a result of these midterms are most likely not going to go our method.'”
To that finish, Speaker Johnson has gone as far as to make use of parliamentary guidelines to successfully block the Home’s skill to vote to repeal Trump’s tariffs, in addition to any effort to vote on a decision calling for an investigation into Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth’s use of the Sign messaging app to debate delicate army operations. “I believe it is an overreach right here,” stated Rep. Mary Scanlon, D-Pa., on Monday, “I believe it is merely for the aim of getting to keep away from robust votes.”
For his half, Thune informed reporters on Tuesday that Republicans need to be “good companions” to a president who Thune reiterated has a mandate — “It was clear, it was decisive” — to enact his coverage targets.
A near-term coverage combat that might upend the Senate indefinitely
Newly minted Senate Majority Chief John Thune, R-S.D., has been working judiciously with Senate Republicans to make these coverage targets a actuality within the one “large, lovely invoice” Trump has demanded.
That large endeavor is meant to make Trump’s 2017 tax cuts everlasting in addition to embrace border safety and power provision utilizing a finances course of known as reconciliation that permits the bulk get together to skirt the filibuster, the chamber’s 60-vote threshold to cross most laws, and advance the bundle with out Democratic votes.
Thune has already described it as an “arduous” course of that usually entails counting on the Senate parliamentarian to referee what can and what suits the strict guidelines for a reconciliation invoice.
The parliamentarian is a non-partisan Senate staffer tasked with safeguarding Senate guidelines. Up to now, reconciliation has been guided by that individual’s judgment. As an example, Democrats needed to incorporate a $15 federal minimal wage hike in a 2021 pandemic reduction bundle that superior below reconciliation guidelines. However the parliamentarian nixed the coverage as a result of it didn’t adjust to the sophisticated guidelines for what’s allowed in such a invoice.
As an example, to ensure that a invoice to qualify for reconciliation and the decrease, 50-vote threshold for passage, it typically can not improve the federal deficit over the subsequent decade.
However Republicans, backed by Majority Chief Thune, are already trying to bypass that rule–and the parliamentarian–in order to make use of a good evaluation for the deficit affect of the tax cuts. In actuality, trillions can be added to the U.S. nationwide debt over the subsequent decade if Trump’s tax cuts are prolonged with out methods to pay for them.
Binder says ignoring the parliamentarian could be consequential. “When you simply ignore parliamentary historical past, it is actually for a scarcity of a greater time period, it is actually ‘Calvin ball‘ the place you select your guidelines solely for the aim of getting the end result that you really want, and that is fairly destabilizing to the U.S. Congress.”
Thune will even possible face strain to overrule the parliamentarian if the official guidelines that provisions on immigration or power coverage don’t adjust to finances guidelines. Thune has stated publicly he doesn’t want to overrule the parliamentarian, however he may face a strain marketing campaign from Trump to get what the president needs in that invoice.
Democrats warn that doing so would quantity to going “nuclear” and threaten the foundational pillar of minority rule within the Senate: the filibuster. “They’re tramping everywhere in the guidelines which have ruled the Senate for many years so as to give large tax cuts for his or her billionaire mates,” stated Schumer on the Senate flooring earlier this month.
