A federal decide on Thursday denied Tennessee level guard Zakai Zeigler’s request for a preliminary injunction permitting him to play a fifth season of Division I basketball in 5 years.
U.S. District Decide Katherine A. Crytzer listened to arguments in a listening to June 6 in Knoxville and entered her denial Thursday morning. She wrote that Zeigler did not show he would probably achieve his argument that the NCAA holding him from taking part in a fifth season of Division I basketball is a violation beneath the Sherman Act.
“This Court docket is a court docket of legislation, not coverage,” Crytzer wrote in her order denying the injunction. “What the NCAA ought to do as a coverage matter to learn pupil athletes is past the attain of the Sherman Act and TTPA and by extension, this Court docket.”
The 2-time Southeastern Convention defensive participant of the 12 months requested for an injunction when he sued the NCAA on Could 20 over its guidelines limiting him to 4 seasons in a five-year window as an illegal restraint of commerce beneath each federal and Tennessee legal guidelines.
His lawsuit argues he may earn between $2 million and as a lot as $4 million with one other season. His attorneys made clear that is only a first step on this authorized struggle.
“We’re dissatisfied the Court docket declined to grant a preliminary injunction on the idea that the NCAA doesn’t instantly management NIL compensation, simply days after the Home settlement confirmed they’d do precisely that,” in accordance with a press release from Litson PLLC and the Garza Legislation Agency.
“This ruling is simply the primary chapter of what we imagine will finally be a profitable problem. We intend to press ahead and are evaluating the perfect path forward for Zakai.”
The decide wrote that the harms Zeigler argues he would endure could be addressed with a future damages award.
She additionally famous the “mounted variety of roster spots” for every Division I basketball staff and that “an injunction would run the chance of harming presently enrolled gamers dedicated to a college and present highschool seniors being recruited.”
The NCAA argued in its temporary earlier than the listening to that Zeigler’s injunction request ought to be denied as a result of he’s asking the court docket to make him the primary athlete in historical past to play a fifth season in Division I “as a matter of proper.”
In the course of the listening to, the decide requested Zeigler’s attorneys to file a fast temporary answering whether or not or not Zeigler is an “intercollegiate athlete” as outlined beneath state legislation and what authorized commonplace applies to Zeigler’s declare beneath the Tennessee Commerce Practices Act.
The Related Press contributed to this story.
Need nice tales delivered proper to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports activities account, observe leagues, groups and gamers to obtain a customized publication every day!
FOLLOW Comply with your favorites to personalize your FOX Sports activities expertise 
Supply hyperlink
