Russ Vought, director of the White Home Workplace of Administration and Finances, speaks at a press briefing throughout President Trump’s first time period, in 2019.
Evan Vucci/AP
disguise caption
toggle caption
Evan Vucci/AP
The White Home price range workplace on Friday rejected the conclusion of a nonpartisan congressional watchdog that mentioned the Trump administration is breaking the legislation by not spending funds as directed by Congress.
The Authorities Accountability Workplace (GAO) issued a report on Thursday that mentioned the Trump administration violated the Impoundment Management Act by blocking spending on electrical automobile charging stations.
The $5 billion in funding was from the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Act. Blocking the spending has put building initiatives deliberate by states into limbo. The GAO mentioned the Trump administration wanted to undergo a proper rescissions course of — the place Congress agrees to the cuts — so as to cease the spending, moderately than unilaterally chopping it off.
Trump’s price range director Russ Vought on social media dismissed the GAO report — and different related GAO investigations — saying they have been “non-events with no consequence. Rearview mirror stuff.”
“They’ll name the whole lot an impoundment as a result of they wish to grind our work to handle taxpayer {dollars} successfully to a halt,” Vought mentioned.
A spokesperson for the Division of Transportation instructed NPR that the GAO report “reveals an entire misunderstanding of the legislation” however they added that the division is reviewing and updating the steering on the Nationwide Electrical Car Infrastructure program “as a result of the implementation of NEVI has failed miserably.”
That is the most recent salvo in a combat about authorities spending
Beneath the Structure, Congress has the facility of the purse. After funding disputes with President Richard Nixon, Congress handed the Impoundment Management Act in 1974 that requires presidents to spend cash as Congress directs.
Trump mentioned on the marketing campaign path that he would problem that legislation — and Vought, who additionally led the Workplace of Administration and Finances in Trump’s first time period, has lengthy championed this combat.
Vought has argued the 1974 legislation is unconstitutional. In Trump’s first time period, he was concerned in an effort to dam assist to Ukraine — a transfer that Congress pushed again in opposition to, and which ultimately led to Democrats’ first impeachment of Trump. On Friday, Vought accused the GAO of being partisan due to its position throughout that debate.
In Trump’s second time period, the problem is anticipated to ultimately head to the Supreme Courtroom.
Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., who’s the vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, mentioned in a press release that Trump is breaking the legislation by blocking the funding handed by Congress.
“I do not care about Russ Vought’s private interpretation of our spending legal guidelines; the Structure is obvious, and President Trump merely doesn’t have the facility of the purse — Congress does,” Murray mentioned.
As of April, the GAO was trying into 39 different potential situations of impoundment underneath the Trump administration.
The impoundment act permits the pinnacle of the GAO to sue the president, if the company concludes there was a violation of the legislation. GAO hasn’t mentioned it will, on this case.
Plenty of states have already sued the Trump administration over its pause of funds for electrical automobile charging.
