Tuesday, July 1, 2025
Google search engine
HomeNewsPolitical NewsWhy Is Most cancers Drug Revlimid So Costly? — ProPublica

Why Is Most cancers Drug Revlimid So Costly? — ProPublica


ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of energy. Signal as much as obtain our largest tales as quickly as they’re printed.

The ache jolted me awake. It was barely daybreak, a misty February morning in 2023. My facet felt as if I’d been stabbed.

I had been coping with ache for weeks — a bothersome ache that felt like a foul runner’s cramp. However now it was so intense I needed to brace myself in opposition to the wall to face up.

A couple of hours after arriving on the emergency room, I heard my title. A health care provider requested me to observe him to a personal space, the place he informed me a scan had uncovered one thing “regarding.”

There have been lesions, areas of bone destruction, on high of each of my hip bones and on my sternum. These had been hallmarks of a number of myeloma. “Most cancers,” he mentioned.

A number of myeloma is a blood most cancers that ravages bone, leaving distinctive holes in its wake. Subsequent scans confirmed “innumerable lesions” from my neck to my ft in addition to two damaged ribs and a compression fracture in my backbone. There is no such thing as a remedy.

I walked out of the ER seeking recent air. I sat on a steel bench and did what many sufferers do. I turned to Google. The primary hyperlink was a medical evaluate stating that the common lifespan of a newly identified affected person was three to 5 years. My abdomen churned.

I quickly discovered that data was outdated. Most sufferers at the moment dwell for much longer, largely resulting from a drug with a horrific previous. It was a physician on the hospital who first informed me I’d possible take a thalidomide drug as a part of my therapy.

That couldn’t be attainable, I informed him.

I knew the story of thalidomide, or no less than I believed I did. It represented one of many darkest chapters within the historical past of recent medication, having triggered 1000’s of extreme beginning defects after it was given to pregnant girls within the Fifties and Nineteen Sixties. The drug was banned in a lot of the world, and the scandal gave rise to the modern-day U.S. Meals and Drug Administration.

It seems the drug as soon as relegated to a pharmaceutical graveyard had new life as a most cancers fighter.

That drug I take is known as Revlimid. It’s a by-product of thalidomide, a barely tweaked model of the mother or father compound.

Revlimid is now one of many bestselling pharmaceutical merchandise of all time, with complete gross sales of greater than $100 billion. It has prolonged tens of 1000’s of lives — together with my very own.

However Revlimid can also be, I quickly discovered, terribly costly, costing almost $1,000 for every every day capsule. (Though, I later found, a capsule prices simply 25 cents to make.)

Why Do People Pay Extra for Prescription Medication?

That steep tab has put the drug’s lifesaving potential out of attain for some most cancers sufferers, who’ve been pressured into debt or just stopped taking the drug. The worth additionally helps gasoline our ballooning insurance coverage premiums.

For many years, I’ve reported on outrageous well being care prices within the U.S. and the burden they place on sufferers. I’ve revealed the techniques utilized by drug corporations to drive gross sales and maintain the value of their merchandise excessive.

Even with my expertise, the price of Revlimid stood out. Once I began taking the drug, I’d take a look at the graceful, cylindrical capsule in my hand and think about the actual fact I used to be about to swallow one thing that prices about the identical as a brand new iPhone. A month’s provide, which arrives in an abnormal, orange-tinged plastic bottle, is similar value as a brand new Nissan Versa.

I needed to understand how this drug got here to value a lot — and why the value retains going up. The worth of Revlimid has been hiked 26 instances because it launched. A few of what occurred was reported on the time. However nobody has pieced collectively the complete account of what the drugmaker Celgene did, how federal regulators didn’t rein it in and what the story reveals about unrestrained drug pricing in America.

What I found astonished even me.

My journey began with an indefatigable New York Metropolis lawyer on a quest to offer her dying husband an opportunity.

Tiny and Terrifying

Beth Wolmer’s story begins on a moon-splashed seashore within the Cayman Islands within the winter of 1995. She and her husband, Ira, had been holding arms as they walked within the sand, having fun with a uncommon break from a busy life as dad and mom to a 1-year-old daughter and demanding jobs as 30-something professionals in New York Metropolis.

They’d met by means of associates and clicked from the beginning. On Sunday mornings, they sat collectively for hours, sharing sections of the newspaper and consuming bagels. They deliberate journeys to Europe and outings to the Metropolitan Museum of Artwork.

Ira was an interventional heart specialist who adopted his father into medication. Beth was a lawyer on the high-powered agency Skadden Arps.

“We had an incredible life,” Beth informed me. “I particularly bear in mind coming residence on the bus and considering: ‘My life is simply excellent, excellent. I’m not going to vary a factor.’”

As they walked that night time within the Caribbean, Ira felt a pointy ache in his cheekbone. The ache flared a number of extra instances in the course of the journey, changing into so intense that it introduced tears to his eyes.

When he received residence, Ira made an appointment to determine what was mistaken. Imaging assessments revealed a number of myeloma. The prognosis was grim. The couple was informed Ira had two years to dwell.

Specialists advisable therapies that will solely present a short reprieve. The couple searched for somebody who may supply one thing extra. That’s once they discovered Dr. Bart Barlogie in Little Rock, Arkansas.

I’ve by no means been extra frightened of a partner of a affected person than I used to be of her.

—Dr. David Siegel, who handled Ira Wolmer

Barlogie had been recruited to the College of Arkansas for Medical Sciences from the extra prestigious MD Anderson Most cancers Middle in Houston. In Texas, Barlogie had been annoyed by a medical tradition that he considered as too timid in its strategy to a number of myeloma.

He remembers engaged on a Sunday when a newly identified affected person was admitted to the hospital. With few choices, Barlogie determined to place the affected person on a taxing, four-drug chemotherapy cocktail used for lymphoma sufferers. It didn’t work. The affected person died from a sepsis an infection, a recognized complication of the therapy.

The attending doctor later admonished him, Barlogie mentioned, saying, “Bart, we now have to be taught to deal with myeloma gently.” Barlogie mentioned he thought to himself, “Fuck you.”

In Arkansas, Barlogie was in cost. He rapidly developed a repute as a practitioner keen to strive something to battle the deadly illness. Sufferers from all over the world — together with the actor Roy Scheider from the film “Jaws” — flocked to his clinic.

Beth and Ira heard Barlogie earlier than they noticed him. The cowboy boots he’d taken to donning since his time in Houston clacked down the linoleum hallway flooring. A brief, slight man, Barlogie had a booming voice with a German accent. He wore leather-based jackets and spherical, red-framed glasses on his bald head.

When he strode into the examination room, he hugged Beth and Ira and informed them they’d come to the proper place.

Now retired, Barlogie remembers being struck by Beth’s depth. He mentioned she informed him “you could do one thing” to assist Ira.

I met Barlogie at his residence in Little Rock. We sat in his workplace, which is stuffed with photographs of the purple Ducati motorbike he used to journey to work. An outdated license plate with the letters “MMCURED” sat on a shelf, reflecting his aim to discover a remedy for a number of myeloma.

When Beth and Ira discovered him, Barlogie informed me, he had been having some success with a novel strategy that put sufferers by means of two stem cell transplants just a few months aside, which he known as a tandem stem cell transplant. With a transplant, a affected person is bombarded with high-dose chemotherapy to kill the cancerous plasma cells. The affected person is then infused with wholesome stem cells that journey to the bone marrow.

The extraordinary chemotherapy could be grueling and poses a small danger of demise.

Ira underwent three transplants. Every time, he relapsed. By the autumn of 1997, after two years of therapy, Ira’s thick black hair was gone. He was reducing weight. Then he had a stroke. His kidneys failed and required dialysis. He developed pneumonia and needed to be intubated.

Beth was decided to maintain him alive lengthy sufficient for his or her toddler daughter to recollect him. With {a photograph} of Ira smiling with their child as motivation, she utilized her lawyer’s tenacity to the case. She pored over medical journals and peppered oncologists with questions on why what they had been attempting wasn’t working or quizzing them a few promising research. When docs informed her there was nothing extra they may do for her husband, she refused to simply accept it.

“She is a tiny individual, however she is terrifying,” mentioned Dr. David Siegel, a part of the staff that handled Ira in Arkansas. “I’ve by no means been extra frightened of a partner of a affected person than I used to be of her.” He meant it as a praise.

By late fall in 1997, Ira was dying and Beth was determined.

A researcher informed her in regards to the work of Dr. Judah Folkman, a surgeon and researcher at Boston Kids’s Hospital. Folkman believed the expansion of cancerous tumors may very well be stunted by ravenous them of a provide of latest blood vessels.

“Thank You, God”

Folkman was a workaholic who, when he wasn’t within the working room or the analysis lab, was touring the world over to advertise his novel idea of the best way to assault most cancers. Friends had ridiculed his thought since he first proposed it within the Nineteen Seventies. The prevailing perception on the time was that tumors didn’t want a brand new blood provide to develop.

A younger researcher in his lab, an ophthalmologist named Robert D’Amato, was at work on the highest query Folkman had posed. May they provide you with a drug, in capsule type, that blocks the expansion of latest blood vessels?

Folkman has since died, but it surely wasn’t troublesome for me to trace down D’Amato. He nonetheless works at Boston Kids’s Hospital, the place he has his personal lab and holds the Judah Folkman Chair in Surgical procedure. Now in his early 60s, D’Amato has a youthful power and speaks in a fast, matter-of-fact clip.

D’Amato informed me that he had got down to discover present medicine that block blood vessel progress. He began by considering of his personal physique and unintended effects attributable to sure medicine. A drug that causes hair loss could be the results of the blood provide to hair follicles being shut off, for instance. However this train wasn’t producing any viable candidates.

After giving it some thought, D’Amato realized he had myopically narrowed his search. What a few girl’s physique? There have been medicine that stopped menstrual cycles. Then there have been medicine that triggered beginning defects in pregnant girls. In each of these circumstances, it was attainable the drug was inhibiting blood vessel progress. He got here up with an inventory of 10 medicine. On the high of the listing was one with a devastating historical past: thalidomide.

Starting within the Fifties, pregnant girls in Europe, Australia and different nations had been incessantly prescribed thalidomide as a therapy for morning illness and to assist them sleep. The drug was considered innocent and in Germany was bought over-the-counter. An commercial for thalidomide in the UK claimed it may “be given with full security to pregnant girls and nursing moms with out adversarial impact on mom or baby.”

They had been mistaken.

The drug was ultimately linked to beginning defects in additional than 10,000 infants. These infants had been born with out limbs or with shortened limbs, malformed arms, disfigured faces and injury to inside organs. Almost half died inside months of being born.

By the early Nineteen Sixties, the drug was broadly banned, thought of a shameful chapter within the historical past of prescribed drugs. It was by no means bought within the U.S. because of the unwavering objections of a resolute reviewer on the FDA named Frances Oldham Kelsey. The shut name, nevertheless, prompted Congress to require extra rigorous security and efficacy information from drug producers and empower the FDA to watch the business extra intently.

D’Amato theorized that the thalidomide beginning defects had been the results of the drug stopping the expansion of latest blood vessels that the fetus must develop. He walked me by means of his experiments: He cracked a fertilized hen egg on a glass petri dish and positioned thalidomide on the floor. After two days, if no blood vessels develop on the embryo, a halo ought to seem across the thalidomide pattern, displaying the drug labored. It didn’t.

Folkman informed D’Amato to maneuver on. However D’Amato couldn’t shake the disappointing outcomes. He did extra analysis and realized thalidomide must first be damaged down within the physique to impact people. He bought metabolites of thalidomide, repeated the check and this time discovered a halo across the pattern.

He saved experimenting and in 1994 printed a paper discovering that thalidomide had “clear implications” for treating tumors.

So when Beth known as three years later, Folkman informed her they need to strive it.

Barlogie informed me he didn’t assume it will work. Beth mentioned she needed to persuade him to strive it.

Barlogie agreed to check it on Ira and two different sufferers who had been out of therapy choices in early December.

I needed him alive perpetually.

—Beth Wolmer

The drug didn’t work for Ira. Beth mentioned simply earlier than he died, Ira sat up in mattress, kissed her and smiled. It was March 10, 1998. He was 38.

After years of frantically looking for something that will assist, the finality of his demise was troublesome to simply accept, she mentioned. “I needed him alive perpetually.”

It’s unclear what occurred with the second affected person. The third affected person, nevertheless, began to get higher.

His title was Jimmy. Little extra is thought about him besides that he was a affected person of one other oncologist on the hospital, Dr. Seema Singhal, and close to demise earlier than he began the drug. “I informed him it would work, however on the very least it will assist him sleep,” Singhal mentioned. Shortly after Jimmy took his first dose of thalidomide, Singhal left for a trip.

Dr. Bart Barlogie and Dr. Seema Singhal

Credit score:
Portray by James Lee Chiahan for ProPublica

When she returned two weeks later, her mailbox was stuffed with lab outcomes for Jimmy. He was nonetheless alive. She sat all the way down to double-check the outcomes, which confirmed declining quantities of a most cancers marker. “For half-hour, I used to be the one individual on this planet who knew this labored,” she mentioned.

Singhal walked all the way down to Barlogie’s workplace to offer him the information. “He took me by the hand, opened a window and shouted, ‘Thanks, God,’” she mentioned.

“Violent Arguments”

Phrase of Jimmy’s beautiful restoration in Arkansas rapidly made its option to the workplaces of Celgene Corp., situated in a small company park in a rural patch of northern New Jersey.

The corporate had simply wrapped up a brutal year-end accounting, which confirmed losses of $27 million on income of simply $1.1 million. Cash was so tight that executives engaged in what one among them known as “violent arguments” over whether or not to cost staff for espresso.

Celgene had acquired the rights to thalidomide patents held by researchers at Rockefeller College in 1992. The corporate, which was new to prescribed drugs, deliberate to make use of the expertise of acquiring FDA approval for thalidomide to develop different medicine.

“It wasn’t meant to be a blockbuster,” mentioned Sol Barer, who began on the firm in 1987 and later turned CEO.

When Celgene introduced plans to develop the disgraced drug for brand new makes use of, the one analyst following the corporate on Wall Avenue dropped protection and informed Celgene officers they didn’t know what they had been doing.

The corporate thought the most important market could be as a therapy for AIDS sufferers experiencing harmful weight reduction. To win approval of the drug, nevertheless, Celgene chosen a use that was already in apply in components of the world for a small group of sufferers.

In July 1998, the FDA accepted thalidomide for the therapy of a painful complication of leprosy. It was a momentous resolution, coming only a few many years after the drug triggered a lot hurt.

The marketplace for leprosy was tiny, however what occurred with Jimmy in Arkansas modified all the things for the corporate.

Blocked Exits

The Arkansas docs had been busy since first testing thalidomide on Ira Wolmer, Jimmy and the opposite affected person. They rapidly received approval to conduct a bigger experiment funded by a grant from the U.S. Nationwide Institutes of Well being. Now, in December 1998, they had been able to share their preliminary findings on the annual assembly of the American Society of Hematology.

It had been three many years since a brand new remedy for a number of myeloma had been accepted, and there was a buzz among the many oncologists gathered in Miami Seashore for the convention. So many docs crowded into the room for the presentation that the fireplace marshal needed to intervene a number of instances to clear exit methods. Phrase had already unfold amongst a number of myeloma specialists about Jimmy. Now, the assembled docs needed to know whether or not it had been a fluke or a discovery that will basically change how they practiced.

Singhal was tasked with presenting the info. It was a giant stage for the 32-year-old physician, who had solely been practising within the U.S. for 2 years.

It fully modified the therapy panorama.

—Dr. Seema Singhal

The 89 sufferers within the research had been high-risk circumstances who had undergone prior therapy. They had been sufferers who, like Ira, had run out of choices. Now, after thalidomide therapy, one-third had declines in myeloma exercise.

These had been beautiful numbers, in contrast to something seen earlier than within the therapy of a number of myeloma. When Singhal completed, the room erupted in applause.

“It fully modified the therapy panorama,” she mentioned.

I wasn’t in a position to observe down Jimmy, however I’ve a way of how he may need felt when he realized the therapy was working.

After my preliminary emergency room go to, it took time to substantiate my analysis and do some further testing. Whereas I waited, the ache worsened. Painkillers barely made a dent. All I may image was this most cancers consuming away at my bones, doing extra injury daily.

David Armstrong

Credit score:
Portray by James Lee Chiahan for ProPublica

Some sufferers wait months for care. I used to be fortunate sufficient to satisfy my oncologist inside weeks. He had a script for Revlimid able to go, a part of a routine of 4 medicine I’d take as commonplace induction remedy, and I used to be in a position to begin it inside days.

The preliminary dose of Revlimid value $18,255 for a month’s provide, and my insurance coverage coated the associated fee.

Inside a month, my blood assessments confirmed an enormous drop in a key most cancers indicator.

My ache step by step subsided too. By the top of April, I wrote in my journal that the ache was a 3 or 4 as an alternative of the standard 9 or 10. “It doesn’t harm to get away from bed anymore,” I wrote.

A Piggy Financial institution

The invention in Arkansas made thalidomide, which Celgene bought as Thalomid, an immediate hit.

In consequence, Celgene’s income elevated almost sevenfold to $26.2 million within the 12 months after the Miami presentation. It bought its thalidomide capsules for $7.50 every.

From these modest beginnings, Celgene took a barely altered model of that capsule and turned it into one of many bestselling and costliest pharmaceuticals in historical past. Celgene’s success with Thalomid was the results of exceptional luck, a case the place the heavy lifting of discovery and preliminary testing had already been completed, by Beth Wolmer, D’Amato, Barlogie, Singhal and others.

The event of the drug that will turn out to be Revlimid took me deep into the confounding, sharp-elbowed world of drug patents, which ostensibly defend drugmakers, permitting them to recoup the large investments they made in growing a brand new product. Celgene drew on patent legislation, a drug security system and even affected person help packages to protect the exclusivity of its prized drug and the large income it generated.

These techniques, detailed in reams of courtroom filings, allowed Celgene to deal with Revlimid like a piggy financial institution, tapping it at any time when it needed.

There was a standard inside theme at Celgene that most cancers sufferers had been keen to pay nearly any quantity Celgene charged.

—David Schmidt, a former Celgene government

Amid the early success of Thalomid, Celgene recognized two potential threats: One was apparent. Thalidomide triggered beginning defects, a looming danger that would lead to it being pulled from the market.

The opposite was that Celgene held restricted patents on the drug. Patents are unique authorized rights to innovations, and researchers file them on almost each facet of drug growth as quickly as they will, locking up all the things from particular units of elements to the best way the drug is used and administered. The extra strong patents an organization has, the longer it could doubtlessly keep at bay opponents.

Thalidomide was an outdated drug and Celgene’s patents didn’t cowl the energetic ingredient, leaving it open to competitors. The patents it did have, overlaying objects such because the optimum dosages and its use in treating explicit ailments, had been thought of weaker and open to a courtroom problem. If Celgene may create a brand new model of thalidomide — ideally one which didn’t trigger beginning defects — the corporate may search extra and stronger patents that will prolong past these of the unique drug.

So researchers at Celgene examined analogs of thalidomide, that are medicine which have an identical impact however are completely different from the mother or father compound in minor methods, equivalent to having one much less oxygen atom. The analogs are additionally stronger than the unique, which means they will obtain an identical impact at decrease doses.

Celgene was not alone in its efforts. D’Amato was additionally finding out thalidomide analogs and submitting patents on their use, which he and Boston Kids’s Hospital licensed to a Celgene competitor, EntreMed Inc.

With dueling patents, the businesses sued one another in 2002.

Celgene was newly flush with money from rising gross sales of thalidomide. EntreMed, however, was burning by means of cash because it centered most of its assets on growing different medicine found in Folkman’s lab.

In December of 2002, the businesses settled.

Celgene agreed to pay Boston Kids’s Hospital royalties from future gross sales of Revlimid. In trade, the hospital and D’Amato licensed their patents of thalidomide analogs to Celgene. Celgene additionally agreed to pay EntreMed $27 million.

For Celgene, the battle with EntreMed was a useful expertise. It discovered that competitors could be neutralized.

The Rise of Revlimid

Celgene had saved the value of Thalomid low when it was initially meant for AIDS sufferers, CEO John Jackson informed buyers in 2004, as the corporate “didn’t need large numbers of individuals demonstrating in entrance” of its workplace.

That wasn’t an issue with most cancers sufferers. There was “loads of room for very substantial will increase” within the value of the drug now, Jackson informed buyers.

It’s time for us to take Jimbo to the wooden shed.

—A senior Celgene official discussing a physician crucial of Revlimid

Simply two days earlier, Celgene had hiked the value of Thalomid to $47 a capsule.

“There was a standard inside theme at Celgene that most cancers sufferers had been keen to pay nearly any quantity Celgene charged,” wrote David Schmidt, a former nationwide account supervisor on the firm, in a whistleblower lawsuit he filed after his employment was terminated in 2008. The lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed by Schmidt. (Jackson didn’t reply to requests for remark; Schmidt declined to speak to me.)

When Celgene launched Revlimid in December of 2005, it set the preliminary value at $55,000 a 12 months, or $218 a capsule, which was about double what analysts anticipated.

Seven months later, when the FDA accepted the drug for a number of myeloma, the value jumped to $70,560 a 12 months, or $280 a capsule.

The Value of Revlimid Has Elevated 26 Instances Since FDA Approval

Every dot signifies a brand new producer listing value per capsule.

Credit score:
Supply: AnalySource

The associated fee to fabricate every Revlimid capsule, in the meantime, was 25 cents. I discovered a deposition marked “extremely confidential” by which a high Celgene government testified that the associated fee began at 1 / 4 and by no means modified.

Even on Wall Avenue, which cheered larger pricing, the preliminary value of Revlimid prompted concern amongst analysts who tracked the corporate that such aggressive maneuvering would trigger insurers to push again. Within the U.S., that is without doubt one of the solely actual checks on the value of pharmaceuticals.

That concern turned out to be unfounded, and Celgene would repeatedly check the bounds of how excessive it may go.

On the identical time, Celgene labored to mute any criticism of Revlimid.

In 2005, Celgene obtained experiences that Los Angeles oncologist Dr. James Berenson was “bashing” Revlimid in shows sponsored by affected person teams.

In a single e-mail, a senior firm official mentioned, “it’s time for us to take Jimbo to the wooden shed.” The corporate mentioned a variety of choices for coping with the physician, from taking authorized motion to arranging a sit-down with Celgene’s chief government.

Finally, the corporate seems to have selected a friendlier plan of action. Berenson turned a frequent paid speaker and advisor for the corporate, with funds totaling no less than $333,000, in line with Celgene disclosures. Berenson declined to remark.

He wasn’t the one physician the corporate befriended. Cost data present that between 2013 and 2018, Celgene paid docs $11 million for talking engagements and consulting work associated to Revlimid. At one level, Celgene rented a collection on the Houston Astros baseball stadium to throw a celebration for your entire a number of myeloma division on the MD Anderson Most cancers Middle, in line with courtroom testimony. The middle mentioned it was unable to confirm any of these particulars.

They remind me of an octopus with many, many tentacles, and on the finish of every tentacle is a wad of money.

—David Mitchell, president of Sufferers For Reasonably priced Medication

Celgene went on to unfold its largesse throughout the a number of myeloma world. It funded affected person teams, sponsored medical conferences and contracted with prestigious tutorial medical facilities.

“They remind me of an octopus with many, many tentacles, and on the finish of every tentacle is a wad of money,” mentioned David Mitchell, a former Washington, D.C., communications government who launched a nonprofit group to battle for decrease costs after he was identified with a number of myeloma. “All people depends on the cash.” Mitchell mentioned his group, Sufferers For Reasonably priced Medication, doesn’t settle for donations from any entity that earnings from the event or distribution of prescribed drugs.

On the identical time it showered docs and affected person teams with cash, Celgene was shutting Beth Wolmer out. She informed me that John Jackson, the CEO on the time, had promised her a paid board seat on the firm as a method of compensating her for her position within the discovery earlier than the corporate reduce off communication.

Wolmer sued Celgene in federal courtroom in 2009, in search of $300 million or extra for alleged misappropriation of her thought and what she termed the “unjust enrichment” of Celgene.

Celgene mentioned it by no means promised to compensate Wolmer. The corporate additionally urged she tremendously inflated her position within the discovery and, in any occasion, waited too lengthy to take authorized motion.

In 2010, a decide granted Celgene’s movement for abstract judgment within the case, agreeing that the statute of limitations had expired whereas on the identical time expressing “admiration” for Wolmer’s “contribution to the wrestle in opposition to this horrible illness.”

Ira and Beth Wolmer within the Cayman Islands

Credit score:
Portray by James Lee Chiahan for ProPublica

Wolmer has remarried and altered her title to Jacobson. She stays disenchanted about the best way she was handled by Celgene. “There was no ambiguity about who discovered the aim of this drug, and I’m thrilled that it’s serving to so many individuals,” she mentioned. “Why they handled me that method? I don’t know.”

The Generic Menace

After the FDA accepted Revlimid in late 2005, it additionally granted Celgene one thing else: seven years of market exclusivity as a result of the drug treats a uncommon illness. In these seven years, Celgene raised the value of the drug 9 instances, growing the value per capsule by 82% to $397 in 2012.

The corporate additionally fended off challengers by claiming its patents protected the drug from competitors till 2027.

However by 2010 generic makers had been already engaged on copies of the drug, getting ready to problem these patents and enter the market earlier. A authorities evaluation has discovered that generics usually decrease the value of name title medicine by a median of 85% after only one 12 months.

Celgene was nicely conscious of the hazard generics posed and warned in a 2012 monetary submitting that their entry into the market may have a “materials adversarial impact” on its funds. At that time, Revlimid gross sales made up 70% of the corporate’s income.

Celgene wanted one other transfer.

The drug nonetheless posed a danger of beginning defects just like the mother or father compound. In approving the drug, the FDA had mandated a strict security program to regulate its prescription and distribution.

Celgene realized early on that this is also a instrument to thwart competitors. An inside firm presentation on the time famous that the security program may make it “tougher for generic corporations to entry” thalidomide for testing.

Generic drug makers are required by the FDA to check their model in opposition to the model title drug, so they should purchase small quantities of Revlimid from the corporate.

By 2012, no less than six generic makers had requested to buy Revlimid for testing. In each case, Celgene refused.

Federal regulators took discover. The FDA had warned Celgene that it couldn’t use the security program “to dam or delay approval” of generic opponents. Now, it gave the impression to be doing simply that.

The Federal Commerce Fee, which enforces antitrust legal guidelines, had been investigating Celgene for years and in June of 2012 notified the corporate it was poised to take motion.

In a beforehand unreported letter, the FTC mentioned that its workers had advisable submitting a authorized grievance in opposition to the corporate for refusing to promote to opponents, thereby preserving them out of {the marketplace}.

The fee’s endurance is carrying skinny.

—FTC official Richard Feinstein to a Celgene lawyer

In its letter, the FTC famous that whereas Celgene refused to promote its medicine to potential opponents, it routinely offered Revlimid to different third events all over the world, together with researchers and universities finding out the drug.

Then, in August of 2012, the FDA directed Celgene to promote a small quantity of Revlimid to a generic competitor.

With each federal businesses bearing down on Celgene, a closed-door assembly was held at FDA headquarters on the finish of August. The FTC despatched 5 legal professionals, and 11 FDA staffers attended. Celgene confirmed up with a big contingent that included in-house legal professionals and outdoors counsel.

Celgene began by denying it was utilizing the security program to dam generics, in line with minutes of the assembly. (The minutes had been filed in a courtroom case in opposition to Celgene, and it’s unclear in the event that they had been ready by the businesses or the corporate.) Citing the specter of beginning defects, the corporate mentioned that it had reliable security issues about promoting Revlimid to generic corporations and that it wanted to guard its funding within the drug.

Jane Axelrad, an affiliate director for the FDA, informed Celgene that it was elevating security issues as a result of “the corporate doesn’t need generics in the marketplace,” in line with the minutes. She declined to remark.

The assembly ended with out a decision. The FDA had no method of implementing its directive to Celgene. The FTC workers, nevertheless, was nonetheless decided to behave. The company had spent greater than two years investigating Celgene. It employed specialists, deposed Celgene officers and obtained inside firm paperwork.

The workers drafted a grievance alleging the corporate engaged in unfair actions to keep up a monopoly, hoping both that it will push the corporate to conform to promote to opponents to keep away from authorized motion or that Celgene could be pressured to take action by the courts, in line with an individual aware of the company’s stance.

“The fee’s endurance is carrying skinny,” FTC official Richard Feinstein wrote to the corporate’s lawyer in February 2013. “We now have reached a degree the place the workers could also be instructed within the very close to future to begin litigation.” (Feinstein didn’t reply to emails in search of a remark.)

Celgene appeared to relent, telling the FTC that it will promote to generic makers, so long as the FDA accepted their security plan. In July, the FDA accepted the security protocols of generic maker Mylan.

Nonetheless, Celgene refused to promote.

Jon Leibowitz, who was the chairman of the FTC on the time, informed me that Celgene’s promise to cooperate, even when it didn’t lead to any gross sales to generic makers, lessened curiosity within the case amongst his fellow commissioners. Three of 5 commissioners have to vote in favor of commencing litigation. Now, looking back, he mentioned that “if we knew then what we all know now” in regards to the delays, “we actually would have introduced a case.”

The company would shut its case in 2017 with out taking any motion.

With would-be generic opponents sidelined by Celgene’s refusal to promote medicine for testing, the corporate continued to lift the value of Revlimid.

They may increase their value any time they needed to.

—Francis Brown, former Celgene gross sales government

On a Saturday morning in early March of 2014, Celgene President Mark Alles despatched an inside e-mail complaining of disappointing first quarter Revlimid gross sales. Income from the star drug, which had surpassed $1 billion the earlier quarter, was down by about 1% — or $11.4 million.

“I’ve to contemplate each reliable alternative accessible to us to enhance our Q1 efficiency,” he wrote. However the one thought he proposed was a well-recognized one: increase the value of the drug.

Alles mentioned he needed a gathering the next Monday to debate a direct 4% value enhance, adopted by one other enhance of three% originally of September.

The corporate applied these hikes, together with a 3rd in December. It introduced the value of Revlimid to $9,854 a month, or $469 a capsule, and helped increase Revlimid gross sales for the 12 months to $5 billion. Alles didn’t reply to my requests for remark.

“They may increase their value any time they needed to,” mentioned Francis Brown, a former gross sales government on the firm, in a 2015 deposition. I wasn’t in a position to attain Brown for remark.

Celgene discovered an answer to the generic menace when it struck a deal to settle a lawsuit introduced by generic maker NATCO Pharma in 2015. NATCO may convey a generic to market, Celgene agreed, however not for seven extra years — in March 2022. Even then, the generic could be restricted to lower than 10% of the whole marketplace for Revlimid within the first 12 months, with gradual will increase after that.

The deal set the bar for offers with different rivals for restricted generic gross sales, and it ensured that limitless generic competitors — and decrease costs — wouldn’t arrive till 2026.

The delayed entry of generics might have been unhealthy information for sufferers and well being care payors, however there was one constituency that was thrilled with the 2015 deal. Celgene’s inventory jumped almost 10% the day after it was introduced.

“Ridiculous,” “Ugly” and “Killer”

Revlimid turned out to be a unicorn for Celgene, a drug whose monetary success proved unattainable to copy.

In October of 2017, Celgene introduced it was abandoning a once-promising effort to develop a drug for Crohn’s illness. Shares of Celgene declined by 11%.

Because it had completed so many instances previously, Celgene tapped Revlimid to attempt to mitigate the injury. The day it introduced the failure of the Crohn’s drug, it quietly raised the value of Revlimid by 9%.

By the top of the 12 months, Celgene had cumulatively raised the associated fee 20% to $662 a capsule, the most important one-year enhance within the drug’s historical past.

That made Revlimid the most costly Medicare drug that 12 months, with the federal government insurance coverage program spending $3.3 billion to supply it to 37,459 sufferers.

At Celgene, the brash will increase triggered uncommon inside dissent. Betty Swartz, the corporate’s vp of U.S. market entry, objected to the measures in a pricing assembly with the CEO, who on the time was Alles, and different high executives. She mentioned her issues had been swiftly dismissed, in line with a whistleblower lawsuit she filed and later dismissed.

“Why would you be afraid to take a rise on our merchandise?” she mentioned the CEO informed her. “What may very well be the worst factor that occurs … a tweet right here or there and unhealthy press for a bit.” Swartz declined to remark.

The worth will increase added to the burden confronted by many sufferers. In on-line teams, sufferers use phrases like “ridiculous,” “ugly” and “killer” when speaking in regards to the monetary ache they’ve skilled associated to the excessive prices related to Revlimid. Some have taken out mortgages, raided retirement funds or reduce on on a regular basis bills like groceries to pay for Revlimid. Others have discovered abroad suppliers who ship the drug for pennies on the greenback, though docs warning there’s no option to assure high quality. Some simply resolve to not take the drug.

By growing the value of Revlimid, Celgene executives in a number of cases boosted their pay. That’s as a result of bonuses had been tied to assembly income and earnings targets. In some years, executives wouldn’t have hit these targets with out the Revlimid value will increase, a congressional investigation later discovered.

In complete, Celgene paid a handful of high executives a few half-billion {dollars} within the 12 years after Revlimid was accepted.

Robert Hugin, who labored as Celgene’s CEO after which government chairman, obtained $51 million in complete compensation from 2015 to 2017. Hugin retired in 2018 to launch an unsuccessful Senate bid.

Even gross sales reps earned greater than $1 million a 12 months and had been rewarded with journeys to resorts such because the 4 Seasons in Maui. That pay is greater than two instances what the common oncologist earns.

I linked with Hugin simply earlier than Christmas whereas he was driving. He was ardent in his protection of the pricing of Revlimid. He informed me the drug passes any cost-benefit evaluation due to its impression on a number of myeloma sufferers like myself. “Individuals acknowledge when you will have a breakthrough remedy and you’ve got a chance to ship that, you wish to ship that the world over,” he mentioned. “And I believe Revlimid is an instance of a product that ends as much as be a world lifesaver due to what it did.”

Hugin informed me that when Revlimid has limitless generic competitors, the value will probably be “cheaper than aspirin” and sufferers will profit from that low value for a lot of many years.

Celgene additionally cited the price of growing medicine and its expansive analysis efforts as causes for the excessive value of Revlimid. Celgene mentioned it spent $800 million to develop Revlimid and spent a number of hundred million extra on further trials to review the usage of the drug in different cancers. These mixed figures symbolize about 2% to three% of Revlimid gross sales by means of 2018.

The drug didn’t get any higher. The most cancers sufferers didn’t get any higher. You simply received higher at making a living. You simply refined your expertise at value gouging.

—Former Rep. Katie Porter, D-Calif.

By the top of 2018, Celgene’s inventory was down 56% over the previous 15 months amid growth failures. Regardless of the raft of unhealthy information, Alles’ complete pay that 12 months elevated by $3 million to $16.2 million.

Celgene tried desperately to spice up its flagging inventory value by shopping for again $6 billion of its personal shares that 12 months.

Finally, the buyback was not sufficient. Simply days into the brand new 12 months in 2019, Celgene introduced it had agreed to be acquired by Bristol Myers Squibb in a deal valued at $74 billion.

As a part of a severance settlement, high Celgene executives stood to make hundreds of thousands as soon as the deal closed. For Alles, that meant a possible estimated payday of $27.9 million.

Within the fall of 2020, Alles appeared earlier than the Home Oversight Committee, which was investigating the excessive value of pharmaceuticals. He mentioned pricing selections “mirrored our dedication to affected person entry, the worth of a medication to sufferers and the well being care system, the continual effort to find new medicines and new makes use of for present medicines, and the necessity for monetary flexibility.”

When it got here time for questions, then-Rep. Katie Porter, D-Calif., quizzed Alles in rapid-fire model about Revlimid. Did the drug change as the value elevated? Did it work sooner? Had been there fewer unintended effects? The drug was the identical, Alles responded.

“So, to recap right here,” Porter mentioned. “The drug didn’t get any higher. The most cancers sufferers didn’t get any higher. You simply received higher at making a living. You simply refined your expertise at value gouging.”

The Drumbeat Continues

Excessive costs have penalties past particular person sufferers. Whereas there have been great developments within the therapy of my illness, there’s nonetheless no remedy. The specter of relapse hovers over each blood check, each new ache or ache.

The day I discovered I used to be in remission, in November 2023, was bittersweet. I wrote on the time that I didn’t get to ring a bell — the normal signal {that a} most cancers affected person has completed therapy. As a substitute, my physician defined the subsequent step: “upkeep” therapy.

This consists of not solely persevering with Revlimid, however making month-to-month visits to my most cancers heart to get a shot of a bone-strengthening drug, have one other drug injected into my abdomen and blood drawn for lab assessments.

“The go to,” I wrote that day, “solely strengthened the truth that I’m a affected person, and I at all times will probably be.”

For many of us, most cancers will return sooner or later after therapy. And for many sufferers, the medicine ultimately cease working.

Revlimid may also be troublesome to dwell with. Some sufferers stop the drug after growing extreme gastrointestinal points, infections or liver issues. The drug additionally poses an elevated danger of stroke, coronary heart assault and secondary cancers.

These are the trade-offs for preserving a number of myeloma in test.

In the meantime, the drumbeat of value will increase continues below Bristol Myers Squibb, serving to the corporate herald $48 billion in income from Revlimid because it bought Celgene. Bristol mentioned its pricing “displays the continued medical profit Revlimid brings to sufferers, together with different financial components.” The corporate mentioned it’s “dedicated to reaching unfettered affected person entry to our medicines” and gives some monetary assist for eligible sufferers. “Whereas BMS develops costs for its medicines, we don’t decide what sufferers pays out of pocket.”

Final July, the price of my month-to-month Revlimid prescription elevated by 7% to $19,660.

In the beginning of this 12 months, my insurer switched me to generic Revlimid. I didn’t battle it, considering it will lead to a dramatic lower in what ProPublica’s well being plan pays for the drug.

It seems it isn’t a lot of a financial savings: The generic prices $17,349 a month.

Alec Glassford contributed analysis.



Supply hyperlink

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments