Mamdani and Brad Lander show they know the right way to say “no” to a lawless president and his battle—whereas rival Andrew Cuomo stumbles.
Advert Coverage
Zohran Mamdani attends a marketing campaign rally in Queens.(Andrew Lichtenstein / Corbis by way of Getty Pictures)
After President Trump ordered a US army assault on Iran Saturday night time, the outcry from Democrats and a handful of Republicans in Washington was fast. US Consultant Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) introduced, “The President’s disastrous choice to bomb Iran with out authorization is a grave violation of the Structure and Congressional Warfare Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a battle which will ensnare us for generations. It’s completely and clearly grounds for impeachment.” Former Home Judiciary Committee chair Jerry Nadler (D-NY) mentioned, “The President’s choice to bomb Iran was grossly unconstitutional, since solely Congress has the facility to declare battle. The President’s motion will definitely result in many American, Israeli and Iranian deaths and should be condemned within the strongest attainable phrases.” Even New York’s Hakeem Jeffries, the often cautious Democratic minority chief within the Home, objected that “President Trump misled the nation about his intentions, failed to hunt congressional authorization for using army pressure and dangers American entanglement in a doubtlessly disastrous battle within the Center East.”
Ocasio-Cortez, Nadler, and Jeffries weren’t the one New York Metropolis Democrats who spoke up. Two main contenders in Tuesday’s Democratic mayoral main, Zohran Mamdani and Brad Lander, delivered strong condemnations of Trump’s transfer, signaling their willpower to push again in opposition to a lawless president. However the embattled front-runner within the race, former New York governor Andrew Cuomo, failed to reply initially after which despatched blended alerts that bolstered a way that he lacks the political independence and integrity to face as much as Trump.
Mamdani, a state legislator who has shaken up the race along with his spirited progressive candidacy, surged within the closing days earlier than Tuesday’s election—with an Emerson Faculty ballot launched Monday even suggesting that he may narrowly defeat Cuomo within the closing spherical of ranked-choice voting. Somebody pursuing a seismic victory of such consequence for town and the nation may be anticipated to decide on warning when responding to so fast and severe a transfer by the president of the USA. However Mamdani pulled no punches when Trump attacked. On Saturday night time, he declared, “Donald Trump ran for president promising to finish wars, not begin new ones. At present’s unconstitutional army motion represents a darkish, new chapter in his infinite betrayals that now threaten to plunge the world deeper into chaos.”
Present Challenge
Mamdani, an outspoken critic of US international coverage within the Center East—particularly American assist for the Israeli assault on Gaza—argued that the assault on Iran would have penalties for New Yorkers. “In a metropolis as world as ours, the impacts of battle are felt deeply right here at residence. I’m pondering of the New Yorkers with family members in hurt’s method,” he defined, at some extent when bombs have been falling all through the Center East. “Whereas Donald Trump bears fast duty for this unlawful escalation, these actions are the results of a political institution that will quite spend trillions of {dollars} on weapons than carry hundreds of thousands out of poverty, launch infinite wars whereas silencing requires peace, and fearmonger about outsiders whereas billionaires hole out our democracy from inside. For People center aged and youthful, that is all we now have recognized. We can not settle for it any longer.”
Mamdani’s highly effective message was echoed by Lander, the New York Metropolis comptroller who has fashioned a late-stage tag crew with Mamdani within the waning weeks of the mayoral race. Lander mentioned, “Trump’s reckless and unconstitutional strikes in opposition to Iran are a harmful escalation of battle—and threaten numerous Iranian, Israeli and American lives. My ideas are with households fearing for his or her security, and the hundreds of New Yorkers worrying tonight about family members in Iran.”
And what of Cuomo? Within the hours after the assault, his marketing campaign was busy posting footage of the candidate driving in a truck. Then, he was touting an endorsement from the last word institution Democrat, former president Invoice Clinton. Concerning the administration’s bombing of Iran, the Cuomo-friendly New York Put up introduced on Sunday morning, “The Cuomo marketing campaign had no fast touch upon the US airstrikes.”
When the previous governor lastly spoke up on Sunday afternoon, Politico reported, “Cuomo informed reporters Sunday he supported taking out Iran’s nuclear amenities.” Whereas he advised that he wished the president had consulted Congress, Cuomo echoed speaking factors from the White Home and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, claiming that the assault made the world a “safer place.”
Cuomo’s failure to name out Trump with the readability or vitality employed by Mamdani and Lander sparked contemporary criticism of each the Cuomo marketing campaign and the various billionaire Trump backers who’re supporting Cuomo’s candidacy. Mamdani tweeted on Sunday, “Cuomo’s largest donors are cheering Trump on. These are the MAGA warmongers who would have his ear in Metropolis Corridor.”
There shall be those that recommend that Trump’s battle is just not an acceptable difficulty for dialogue within the New York mayoral race. However they might be mistaken. Along with the humane concerns cited by Mamdani and Lander—and New York’s standing as the last word worldwide metropolis—there may be the elemental actuality that an already bloated Pentagon finances is rising at an exponential fee below Trump, all whereas funding for healthcare, training, and transportation will get squeezed.
Progressives have lengthy argued that New York Metropolis wants a mayor who acknowledges that the exponential progress of the military-industrial complicated comes at a price for taxpayers and the residents of nice American cities—and who’s prepared to name out that value on behalf of working-class households.
Town had such a mayor within the Nineteen Sixties: John Lindsay.
When Lindsay first ran for mayor of New York Metropolis in 1965, he made no secret of his opposition to the battle in Vietnam, decrying US involvement within the battle in ethical and sensible phrases. “We’re combating in Vietnam what may be very most likely essentially the most undesirable battle on this nation’s historical past,” mentioned the liberal Republican, who had earned a fame for standing nicely to the left of his celebration—and far of the Democratic Celebration—on home and worldwide points. “We can not resolve the issues by limitless army escalation.”
Advert Coverage
Standard
“swipe left under to view extra authors”Swipe →
He gained that race, however the battle raged on. So, as Lindsay sought reelection in 1969 in what might nicely have been essentially the most intensely contested mayoral race in New York Metropolis historical past, he made his opposition to the battle—which was, by then, being waged by Republican President Richard Nixon—central to his bid. His stance was one of many components that value him the Republican nomination that 12 months. But he fought on, operating as an impartial and on the previous Liberal Celebration line, in opposition to a conservative Republican and an solely barely much less conservative Democrat.
As the autumn race heated up, Lindsay’s rivals complained that the mayor’s amplifying of his anti-war stance was a “diversionary tactic” that drew consideration away from municipal points. But, as a Harvard Crimson evaluation of the 1969 contest famous, “Lindsay’s anti-Vietnam statements weren’t produced solely for the event of the marketing campaign; he alone of the nation’s big-city mayors has taken a gentle and unhedging stand in opposition to the battle. His argument is well-rounded, moreover: Vietnam not solely deprives New York of wanted funds, but it surely makes most partisan scrapping meaningless since all new applications, these proposed by Lindsay and his critics, will need to have the identical cash.”
Lindsay’s rivals saved complaining concerning the mayor’s strikes to make the battle a difficulty within the race. “However,” wrote The New York Instances, “they misplaced that argument.”
When Lindsay addressed mass demonstrations in opposition to the battle—together with the October 15, 1969, Vietnam Moratorium rally—the Instances reported that “the Mayor received essentially the most enthusiastic receptions of his 11-year public profession—simply as he has been receiving the heaviest applause through the marketing campaign when he denounces the battle.”
The Instances defined that the applause got here particularly from younger voters—the identical group most fervently supporting Mamdani now. “However,” the paper requested, “will the applause translate into votes?”
It did. With overwhelming assist from younger voters and anti-war New Yorkers of all ages, John Lindsay swept to reelection, ending eight factors forward of his nearest rival. The Vietnam Warfare was definitely not the one difficulty in 1969’s mayoral race, simply as Trump’s unconstitutional actions aren’t the one difficulty in Tuesday’s main. However problems with battle and peace, and questions of the right way to oppose a dangerously mistaken president, mattered within the politics of town in 1969. And so they matter now.
On daily basis, The Nation exposes the administration’s unchecked and reckless abuses of energy by clear-eyed, uncompromising impartial journalism—the type of journalism that holds the highly effective to account and helps construct options to the world we stay in now.
We’ve simply the precise individuals to confront this second. Talking on Democracy Now!, Nation DC Bureau chief Chris Lehmann translated the complicated phrases of the finances invoice into the plain reality, describing it as “the only largest upward redistribution of wealth effectuated by any piece of laws in our historical past.” Within the pages of the June print difficulty and on The Nation Podcast, Jacob Silverman dove deep into how crypto has captured American marketing campaign finance, revealing that it was the highest donor within the 2024 elections as an business and gained practically each race it supported.
That is all along with The Nation’s distinctive protection of issues of battle and peace, the courts, reproductive justice, local weather, immigration, healthcare, and way more.
Our 160-year historical past of sounding the alarm on presidential overreach and the persecution of dissent has ready us for this second. 2025 marks a brand new chapter on this historical past, and we want you to be a part of it.
We’re aiming to lift $20,000 throughout our June Fundraising Marketing campaign to fund our change-making reporting and evaluation. Stand for daring, impartial journalism and donate to assist The Nation right now.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Writer, The Nation
John Nichols
John Nichols is a nationwide affairs correspondent for The Nation. He has written, cowritten, or edited over a dozen books on matters starting from histories of American socialism and the Democratic Celebration to analyses of US and world media techniques. His newest, cowritten with Senator Bernie Sanders, is the New York Instances bestseller It is OK to Be Offended About Capitalism.
Extra from The Nation
Talking to The Nation, the senator hails the “grassroots motion supporting Zohran” as a significant different to “the billionaire institution supporting Cuomo.”
John Nichols
Because the president backs Israel’s long-awaited battle with Iran, his neoconservative critics discover themselves in an ungainly place.
Column
/
David Klion
If there’s a silver lining, it’s that blue states and municipalities are doubling down on defending staff.
Sasha Abramsky
