Saturday, September 13, 2025
Google search engine
HomeNewsPolitical NewsTexas AG Ken Paxton Is More and more Counting on Pricey Non-public...

Texas AG Ken Paxton Is More and more Counting on Pricey Non-public Attorneys — ProPublica


This text is co-published with The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan native newsroom that informs and engages with Texans. Join The Temporary Weekly to stand up to hurry on their important protection of Texas points.

Reporting Highlights

Going Non-public: Texas Legal professional Common Ken Paxton has more and more employed personal legislation corporations to argue instances for the state.
Connections to Attorneys: Paxton usually has private or political ties to those exterior attorneys. One defended him in his impeachment trial. One other donated to his marketing campaign for workplace.
Totally different States: He’s inked these profitable contracts extra usually than his counterparts in different giant states.

These highlights had been written by the reporters and editors who labored on this story.

Sooner or later in late Might 2024, lawyer Zina Bash spent 6 1/2 hours engaged on a case towards Fb mum or dad firm Meta on behalf of the state of Texas. She reviewed draft authorized filings. She participated in a court-ordered mediation session after which mentioned the result with state Legal professional Common Ken Paxton.

In her earlier job as senior counsel on Paxton’s management crew, that labor would have value Texas taxpayers $641.

However Bash had moved to personal follow. Paxton employed her agency to work on the Meta case, permitting her to invoice $3,780 an hour, in order that day of labor will value taxpayers $24,570.

Prior to now 5 years, Paxton has grown more and more reliant on dear personal attorneys to argue instances on behalf of the state, slightly than the tons of of attorneys who work inside his workplace, an investigation by The Texas Tribune and ProPublica discovered. These are sometimes attorneys, like Bash, with whom Paxton has private or political ties.

Along with Bash, one such contract went to Tony Buzbee, the trial lawyer who efficiently defended Paxton throughout his 2023 impeachment trial on corruption costs. Three different contracts went to corporations whose senior attorneys have donated to Paxton’s political campaigns. Regardless of these connections and what consultants say are potential conflicts of curiosity, Paxton doesn’t seem to have recused himself from the choice course of. Though he’s not required to by legislation, this raises a priority about showing improper, consultants who research attorneys basic stated.

Paxton seems to have additionally outsourced instances extra often than his predecessors, out there information present. And he’s inked the form of contingent-fee contracts, during which corporations obtain a share of a settlement in the event that they win, way more usually than the attorneys basic in different giant states, together with California, New York and Pennsylvania. Since 2015, the New York and California attorneys basic have awarded zero contingent-fee contracts; Pennsylvania’s has signed one. Throughout that interval, Paxton’s workplace accredited 13.

A kind of was with Bash’s agency, Chicago-based Keller Postman, on the time often known as Keller Lenkner, which she joined as associate in February 2021 after resigning from her job on the legal professional basic’s workplace. Paxton had signed a contract with the corporate two months earlier to analyze Google for misleading enterprise practices and violations of antitrust legislation. A bit greater than a 12 months later, Bash’s agency gained a state contract to work on the Meta litigation, alleging its facial recognition software program violated Texans’ privateness. This time, Bash was the co-lead counsel.

Meta, which known as the lawsuit meritless, settled the case for $1.4 billion in the summertime of 2024. It was a windfall for Keller Postman. The agency billed $97 million, the biggest payment charged by exterior counsel below Paxton’s tenure. Bash’s work alone accounted for $3.6 million of that whole.

A letter from Zina Bash to the Texas legal professional basic’s workplace informs the workplace that the state owes her agency, Keller Postman, virtually $97 million for its work on the state’s case towards Meta.

Credit score:
Obtained by The Texas Tribune. Highlighted by ProPublica.

Bash, a former U.S. Supreme Courtroom clerk, stated in an announcement she is honored the legal professional basic’s workplace partnered with Keller Postman based mostly on the agency’s “first-rate attorneys and intensive expertise.”

“We’ve got a file of taking up essentially the most vital litigation within the nation towards essentially the most highly effective defendants on the earth,” Bash stated.

Keller Postman didn’t reply to a request for remark.

There’s little to cease Paxton, or another occupant of his workplace, from handing these contracts out. The legal professional basic can award them with out looking for bids from different legislation corporations or asking anybody’s permission.

Requested to offer competitive-bid paperwork for the contingent-fee contracts it has awarded, the legal professional basic’s workplace stated it had none as a result of state legislation “exempts the OAG from having to do all the solicitation steps when hiring exterior counsel.”

Given the high-profile nature of representing an legal professional basic and the potential for an enormous payday, many certified corporations can be wanting to compete for this work, stated Paul Nolette, a professor of political science at Marquette College who research attorneys basic.

“I’d be curious to know what the justification is for this not occurring the open market,” Nolette stated.

Paxton declined interview requests for this story. He has publicly defended the follow of hiring exterior legislation corporations, arguing that his workplace lacks the sources in-house to tackle large companies like tech firms and pharmaceutical producers.

“These events have virtually limitless sources that will swamp most authorized groups and delay efficient enforcement,” Paxton instructed the Senate finance committee throughout a price range listening to in January.

A spokesperson for Paxton stated in an announcement that the skin attorneys employed by the workplace are a number of the finest within the nation. With the contingent-fee settlements thus far, greater than $2 billion, the state “couldn’t have gotten a greater return on its funding,” the assertion stated.

Chris Toth, former government director of the Nationwide Affiliation of Attorneys Common, questioned why a lot additional assist is required. Exterior counsel is suitable for small states, he stated, that “solely have so many attorneys with so many ranges of experience.”

The Texas legal professional basic’s workplace, one of many largest within the nation, has greater than 700 attorneys.

“Massive states sometimes don’t rent exterior counsel,” Toth stated. “They need to have the folks in-house that ought to be capable to go toe-to-toe with the most effective attorneys which are on the market.”

A Troubled Historical past

When a Texas legal professional basic beforehand made a follow of giving profitable contracts to personal counsel, it didn’t finish nicely.

Dan Morales was the final Democrat to carry the workplace. He grew to become embroiled in scandal after he used exterior corporations to assist safe a $17 billion settlement in Massive Tobacco litigation in 1998.

Republicans, together with then-Gov. George W. Bush, blasted the $3.2 billion payout to the skin attorneys as exorbitant. Their assaults grew extra intense when Morales sought to steer $500 million of that sum to a lawyer, a private pal, who did little or no work on the case. Morales pleaded responsible in 2003 to associated federal corruption costs. He served 3 1/2 years behind bars.

John Cornyn, the Republican who succeeded Morales in 1999, criticized his predecessor’s dealing with of the tobacco case throughout his marketing campaign for the workplace. In an interview for this story, Cornyn stated he by no means employed exterior counsel as legal professional basic as a result of he targeted on recruiting proficient in-house attorneys that he felt may deal with all of the workplace’s instances.

Paxton is difficult Cornyn, now a four-term U.S. senator, in subsequent 12 months’s Republican major.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, the Republican who led the workplace after Cornyn, seems to have not often used personal attorneys. The legal professional basic’s workplace was capable of produce information for under a part of Abbott’s 12-year time period as a result of state legislation permits the information to be deleted after so a few years. The workplace signed 9 exterior counsel contracts between 2010 and 2014, all professional bono or for hourly charges slightly than contingency. Abbott didn’t reply to an interview request.

Paxton additionally seldom outsourced instances throughout his first 5 years in workplace. By way of 2019, he awarded solely 9 exterior counsel contracts, all professional bono or hourly price. The most costly contract capped charges at $500,000 — far lower than $143 million the state paid to the 2 corporations, together with Bash’s, that dealt with the Meta case.

He modified course in 2020.

That summer time, the legal professional basic’s workplace was gearing as much as file its first case towards Google. It associated to allegations that the corporate monopolized the internet advertising market, elevating prices for advertisers, who elevated the value of their merchandise for common shoppers consequently. Paxton initially had no plans to rent exterior counsel for the litigation, three former deputy attorneys basic instructed the Tribune and ProPublica.

However earlier than the case was filed, the legal professional basic’s workplace was thrown into upheaval. On the finish of September, seven of Paxton’s senior advisers reported him to the FBI, involved his relationship with an Austin actual property investor had crossed the road into bribery and corruption. State Home members would later impeach Paxton on counts associated to the accusations; state senators finally acquitted him. The federal felony investigation into Paxton didn’t end in any felony costs.

Over fall 2020, every of the attorneys in his workplace who had accused Paxton of wrongdoing stop or was fired. That included Darren McCarty, the pinnacle of civil litigation who was supposed to guide the Google litigation earlier than he reported his boss to the FBI. He resigned on Oct. 26.

Lower than two months later, on Dec. 16, Paxton signed contracts with The Lanier Regulation Agency and Keller Postman to analyze Google. They filed the lawsuit towards the tech large in federal court docket the identical day.

Paxton changed the attorneys who complained to the authorities. The staffing of the antitrust and shopper safety divisions, which might have dealt with these instances, remained fixed at greater than 80 staff within the following years. But Paxton continued to outsource lawsuits towards giant companies to personal attorneys.

Underneath Keller Postman’s contract, the agency can be paid provided that it secured a settlement or gained at trial. These contingent-fee instances have the potential to be way more worthwhile for the skin corporations than these during which they invoice at an everyday hourly price. In a profitable case, the contracts say that corporations are paid both a proportion of a settlement or the sum of hours billed by the agency instances 4, whichever is much less.

Within the Meta case, Keller Postman was entitled to 11% of the state’s settlement, a share that totaled $154 million. However as a result of the agency’s charges and bills totaled $97 million, it billed that sum.

In a number of legislative periods, Paxton has testified that outsourcing was the one means his workplace may stand toe-to-toe with company titans.

If Paxton has a scarcity of certified in-house attorneys, Cornyn instructed the newsrooms, that’s due to the harm the whistleblower scandal did to the fame of the legal professional basic’s workplace as a house for formidable younger attorneys.

“He’s a sufferer of his personal malfeasance and mismanagement as a result of folks didn’t wish to work for him anymore,” Cornyn stated. “And should you run off your finest attorneys since you have interaction in questionable moral conduct, you then’re left with only a few choices. However this shouldn’t be a solution to reward dangerous habits.”

Former Arizona Legal professional Common Terry Goddard stated he was stunned Paxton started hiring contingent-fee exterior attorneys solely after the scandal, since these contracts, with their potential for top earnings, are harder to ethically defend.

“I’d have thought it could have been the opposite means round — that he obtained extra cautious after he obtained the whistle blown on him,” stated Goddard, a Democrat. “But it surely seemed like he obtained extra reckless.”

Legal professional Common Ken Paxton, proper, sits with lawyer Tony Buzbee on the ninth day of Paxton’s’s impeachment trial on the Texas Capitol in Austin on Sept. 15, 2023.

Credit score:
Julius Shieh/The Texas Tribune

Connections to Contract Recipients

Paxton’s type of procurement additionally benefited Buzbee, the person who efficiently defended him throughout his impeachment trial, which stemmed from allegations the whistleblowers raised.

The legal professional basic selected to skip a lot of the proceedings, so for the ten days of trial within the Texas Senate, his most vociferous advocate was the loquacious Buzbee. The pair sat facet by facet when the legal professional basic did attend.

A bit greater than a 12 months later, Paxton employed The Buzbee Regulation Agency to pursue an antitrust swimsuit towards the funding corporations BlackRock, State Road and Vanguard that accuses the businesses of manipulating the coal market in a means that allegedly elevated electrical energy costs for Texans. The corporations deny wrongdoing.

Buzbee is a profitable litigator and one in every of Houston’s most well-known plaintiffs’ attorneys. Amongst different victories, he gained settlements for victims of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and $73 million for Gulf of Mexico oil drillers in a 2001 antitrust case. However he’s identified primarily for private damage work, not antitrust litigation.

His agency, one in every of two employed for this newest legal professional basic’s workplace contingent-fee case, may acquire 10% of any judgment or settlement. The case is in its early phases, although the Trump administration in Might filed a quick within the case in help of Texas.

Buzbee downplayed the potential for an enormous payday in an e mail to the newsrooms and argued there isn’t a buddy system at play, noting he believed different legislation corporations additionally interviewed with Paxton’s workplace for the job. (The legal professional basic’s workplace didn’t affirm this.) He stated his agency has to pay for vital bills up entrance, with none assure of fee.

“The present association could also be a superb deal for different attorneys, however in all candor, it’s not for me,” Buzbee stated, including that his regular hourly price is $2,250. “Frankly, the one purpose I’m even doing it’s that I’m proud to signify the state in such a landmark case.”

A web page from an out of doors counsel contract, signed by each Buzbee and Paxton, reveals The Buzbee Regulation Agency was employed to signify the state in litigation towards BlackRock Inc., State Road Corp. and The Vanguard Group Inc.

Credit score:
Obtained by The Texas Tribune

The connections between Paxton and the attorneys he has employed additionally prolong to different corporations. The legal professional basic’s workplace employed the agency Norton Rose Fulbright, one of many largest within the nation with greater than 3,000 attorneys on employees, to work on separate Google instances for the state, specializing in shopper safety allegations.

The legal professional basic’s workplace has awarded three contracts to the agency since 2022 for instances towards the tech large. 3 times throughout that interval, Joseph Graham, the agency’s lead counsel on the Google litigation, contributed $5,000 to Paxton’s marketing campaign for legal professional basic. Twice, the donations got here inside 16 days of Graham signing one of many agency’s contracts with the legal professional basic.

The agency and its attorneys have contributed $39,500 to Paxton’s marketing campaign since he took workplace. Neither Graham nor Norton Rose Fulbright responded to requests for remark.

Mark Lanier, founding father of The Lanier Regulation Agency, which the state employed to work on a separate Google case, is a big donor to Texas elected officers. He has contributed $31,000 to Paxton’s campaigns since 2015. The most important contribution, for $25,000, got here six months after Lanier signed his agency’s Google contract.

The Lanier contract is barely totally different from the others the legal professional basic’s workplace awarded, in that the agency’s fee is partially based mostly on a fundamental hourly price nevertheless it is also paid extra if it wins the case, as within the contingent-fee mannequin. Lanier famous in an emailed assertion to the newsrooms that he took a decreased payment on this case and maintained that the legal professional basic’s workplace wanted the form of firepower his crew can deliver towards an opponent like Google.

“The Texas AG workplace and its attorneys are good, however specialists are wanted in a struggle like this. And it’s a struggle,” Lanier wrote. “It might be irresponsible to pursue Google on behalf of Texans with out deliver(ing) the fullest sources you’ll be able to.”

A aggressive, open course of for awarding contracts is usually a sturdy protection towards accusations of favoritism, Goddard stated.

Not like another states, Texas doesn’t require these contracts be put out to aggressive bid.

Florida, for instance, has probably the most strong legal guidelines within the nation for procuring exterior counsel, requiring the legal professional basic to elucidate in writing why a contingent-fee contract is important. It additionally mandates most contracts be put out to aggressive bid and caps contingent-fee payouts at $50 million.

Texas has no such cap.

It additionally has just about no methodology for state lawmakers to actually supervise this sort of follow. State legislation mandates solely that the legal professional basic notify the Legislature when his workplace awards a contingent-fee contract, and certify that no in-house attorneys or personal attorneys at an hourly price can deal with the duty. Paxton has performed so in boilerplate two-page letters that every one say exterior attorneys are wanted due to the “scope and enormity” of the instances.

If lawmakers are involved about these contracts, there isn’t a mechanism for them to problem Paxton’s willpower that non-public counsel is required.

Having attorneys bid for work would remove the looks of impropriety that hangs over Paxton’s hires, Goddard stated.

“A pair appear to be paybacks, which is very improper, in different phrases to award a contract to somebody who’s a significant contributor or has not too long ago left your workplace,” he stated. “All of these wouldn’t be allowed in our state.”

Officers in different states have stated they’ll nonetheless safe large wins for his or her constituents with out counting on personal corporations.

California, for instance, reached a $93 million settlement with Google in 2023 over claims that the corporate was clandestinely monitoring customers’ places. A 12 months earlier, in a case with comparable allegations, Oregon and Nebraska led a 40-state coalition that gained a $392 million settlement towards the corporate. Texas was not a part of this swimsuit.

The latter settlement required Google to make new privateness disclosures to shoppers, restricted its potential to share customers’ location data with advertisers and required the corporate to organize an annual report detailing the way it was complying with the settlement phrases.

Doug Peterson, the Republican legal professional basic of Nebraska on the time, stated negotiating the monetary penalty — Nebraska’s share was $11.9 million — was a secondary purpose of the settlement.

“A very powerful factor we’re making an attempt to do is to cease the dangerous habits,” Peterson stated.

McCarty, one of many legal professional basic staff who blew the whistle on Paxton, stated personal attorneys could be proficient, however they’ve an incentive to fixate on the monetary portion of settlements — which is tied to their compensation — slightly than enforcement provisions that will finest defend a state’s residents.

Trump Administration Seeking to Slash Environmental Safety Guidelines for Rocket Launches

“Authorities enforcers, particularly within the antitrust context, can deal with simpler options,” McCarty stated.

Norton Rose Fulbright has but to ship its last billing information to the legal professional basic’s workplace however is more likely to be rewarded handsomely. The agency helped the state safe a $1.38 billion settlement with Google in Might. Google spokesperson José Castañeda stated the Texas settlement, which has not been finalized, will include no new restrictions on the corporate’s practices.

Underneath the phrases of its contracts, the agency’s charges may exceed $350 million.



Supply hyperlink

RELATED ARTICLES

1 COMMENT

  1. Looks like my earlier comment didn’t appear, but I just wanted to say—your blog is so inspiring! I’m still figuring things out as a beginner,and reading your posts makes me want to keep going with my own writing journey.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments