Not too long ago declassified paperwork point out that folks near former FBI Director James Comey and Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff have been linked to leaks of labeled data to distinguished reporters designed to painting Donald Trump and his allies as being in league with Russia.
Reporters from the New York Instances and Washington Submit shared a 2018 Pulitzer Prize for articles that used labeled leaks to advance the Russigate hoax.
Columbia College, Photograph by Eileen Barroso
Written in 2017, the FBI paperwork expose how chosen Washington reporters, together with Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Submit and Michael Schmidt of the New York Instances, scored a collection of Pulitzer Prize-winning scoops in 2017 by repeating false and inflammatory leaks throughout President Trump’s first time period.
A lot of their reporting has been debunked – and proven to be a part of a smear marketing campaign by high-ranking officers to undermine Trump, however the identities of these leakers have remained hidden due to the federal government’s obvious unwillingness to show its personal and the refusal of reporters to determine the individuals who misled them and the nation.
Though the closely redacted current disclosures don’t particularly determine the suspected leakers, an RCI evaluation of the paperwork strongly suggests that folks near Comey and Schiff, amongst others, have been feeding the reporters data to advance the Russiagate hoax.
The paperwork reveal a cascade of misdeeds and failures. These embody the trouble of presidency officers to create and leak deceptive labeled data to favored reporters and the failure of reporters to scrutinize the knowledge they got earlier than dashing it into print; and the next failure of federal investigators to carry anybody accountable for the breaches of safety.
The paperwork additionally element the incestuous nature of media-government relationships contained in the D.C. Beltway. In some circumstances, spouses and associates of presidency officers and reporters have been used to unfold damaging misinformation about Trump, making it tough for federal investigators to observe the path of unlawful disclosures.
“All of those cozy friendships of leakers and leaker recipients, lots of whom are married to one another, are exactly why reporters adore hiding their sourcing behind partitions of ‘senior administration officers’ or ‘senior U.S. officers’ and related disguises,” stated Tim Graham, director of media evaluation for the Media Analysis Heart, a Washington-based journalism watchdog group.
‘Topple the Administration’
FBI paperwork recommend Rep. Adam Schiff weaponized U.S. intelligence to smear Trump within the media.
AP
The brand new disclosures embody the beforehand sealed testimony of an FBI informant who’d labored on the Democratic facet of the Home Everlasting Choose Committee on Intelligence for greater than a decade, who advised brokers that “all hell broke free” after Trump’s stunning 2016 election win. In February 2017, he asserted, Schiff, then a Home member, hatched a plan to weaponize U.S. intelligence to smear Trump within the media as a Kremlin conspirator with the objective of triggering his impeachment. Schiff was the rating Democratic member of the committee on the time.
“Leaking the knowledge was one solution to topple the administration,” the supply advised the FBI in August 2017, including that “all the pieces is directed at Trump and attempting to get him impeached.”
To that finish, Schiff fashioned a “Russia group” inside the committee to view and disseminate labeled materials on Trump that it requested from the CIA and FBI, the informant stated. Essential group members allegedly included Schiff staffers Rheanne Wirkkala and Timothy Bergreen. Schiff’s workers director, Michael Bahar, and his communications director, Patrick Boland, allegedly “orchestrated” the smear marketing campaign.
A spokesperson for Sen. Schiff “categorically” denied the allegation in opposition to Boland, now Schiff’s chief of workers, and claimed that the FBI informant was “a disgruntled former staffer who was fired by the Home Intelligence Committee in early 2017 for a sample of inappropriate conduct, together with mistreatment of workers and compromising exercise on international official journey.”
Data, nevertheless, present the informant left the committee in September 2017, and had made his allegations to the FBI in interviews with brokers whereas he was nonetheless on workers, in response to FBI-302 summaries.
Wirkkala, Bergreen and Bahar didn’t reply to requests for remark.
The FBI supply, “who thought-about Schiff a buddy,” advised brokers that he was referred to as into the 2017 assembly throughout which Schiff particularly approved leaking labeled “grime“ to reporters.
“On this assembly, SCHIFF acknowledged that the group would leak labeled data which was derogatory to President of the US Donald J. Trump,” stated the FBI interview report, generally known as an FD-302, which famous that the whistleblower memorialized the Monday, Feb. 13, 2017, workers assembly in an e mail he despatched to himself the subsequent day. “SCHIFF acknowledged the knowledge could be used to indict President TRUMP.”
Schiff has denied the allegations. The FBI subpoenaed a number of the California lawmaker’s communications data, however by no means charged him with a criminal offense. (Schiff is at the moment beneath investigation for potential mortgage fraud.)
The nameless whistleblower – whose identify is blacked out within the FBI experiences, however in response to a number of sources is Robert Minehart – labored as coverage advisor to Schiff on the minority facet of the intelligence committee. He first joined the committee in 2005, after then-ranking Democratic Rep. Jane Harman of California recruited him from the Nationwide Safety Company, the place he labored as an engineer.
Minehart left the panel in late 2017 after he stated Schiff loyalists “marginalized” him for complaining to each the committee’s safety chief and the CIA’s inspector normal about “the rampant leaking” of labeled data. He advised FBI area brokers he believed the labeled leaks have been “unethical and treasonous,” however was reluctant to complain about them to the FBI congressional liaison workplace as a result of he considered the officers there as “too embedded with HPSCI workers and can’t belief them.”
Former committee staffers who labored with Minehart stated he was a well-respected intelligence skilled who was involved with safeguarding labeled data. They considered him as credible, dependable, and nonpartisan.
“I keep in mind Bob as a former NSA (engineer) who labored the NSA account for the Democrats,” stated Fred Fleitz, a former CIA analyst who served beneath former GOP Home Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers. “However he was by no means a part of the Democrat partisanship on the committee.”
Federal Election Fee data present Minehart has donated to each Democratic and Republican congressional candidates. Although he hasn’t contributed on to any presidential marketing campaign, he gave cash to a PAC tied to Trump in each 2022 and 2023. Makes an attempt to achieve Minehart, now a expertise advisor primarily based in Northern Virginia, have been unsuccessful.
Leaking to the Press
Beginning in 2016, FBI investigative paperwork present that Ellen Nakashima was the go-to reporter for intelligence group leaks on Trump and later turned the topic of 4 separate leak investigations. In June of that yr, she broke the seminal story within the Washington Submit, alleging that “Russian authorities hackers penetrated DNC.” This declare, which was the primary effort to insert Russia into the 2016 election, was superior by the
The cybersecurity agency CrowdStrike helped advance unproven claims that Kremlin hackers stolen DNC emails.
AP
Democratic cybersecurity contractor CrowdStrike. As RCI has beforehand reported, CrowdStrike’s president, Shawn Henry, later confessed in closed-door congressional testimony that CrowdStrike lacked “concrete proof” to help its discovering that Moscow was accountable for stealing emails and different DNC information printed by WikiLeaks. Nakashima, who reported that the DNC breach was international “espionage” and never the work of legal hackers, by no means revisited her authentic story after contradictory info emerged.
In early December 2016, Nakashima and her colleagues have been leaked a “secret CIA evaluation” that discovered Russia was attempting “to assist Trump win the White Home,” in response to her scoop. Nakashima reported that this was the “consensus view” of the Intelligence Group, citing “a senior U.S. official” who’d been briefed on the fabric. Nakashima quoted Schiff on the finish of her story. Later paperwork confirmed that there was no consensus. Many CIA and different intel analysts dissented from the view and believed Moscow’s goal was merely to undermine confidence in U.S. elections.
Lower than three months after Trump took workplace, Nakashima was the lead reporter on one other seeming blockbuster story advancing the Russian “collusion” narrative pushed by Democrats – that the FBI had obtained a wiretap warrant beneath the Overseas Intelligence Surveillance Act to observe former Trump marketing campaign adviser Carter Web page as “an agent of Russia.” FISA data is very labeled and virtually by no means disclosed. However Nakashima was the beneficiary of the bizarre leak, and on April 11, 2017, she reported: “That is the clearest proof thus far that the FBI had purpose to consider throughout the 2016 presidential marketing campaign {that a} Trump affiliate was in contact with Russian brokers.”
Solely, it seems that Web page by no means met with the Russian brokers, and the wiretap warrant software – later invalidated by the FISA courtroom – was additionally primarily based on the bogus Clinton-funded opposition analysis generally known as the Steele file. She attributed her reporting to unnamed “U.S. officers.” Deep in her article, she as soon as once more quoted Schiff on the report.
The Schiff staffers who allegedly funneled secrets and techniques to Nakashima gathered them from CIA and FBI “learn rooms” Schiff had requested the companies to arrange, in response to data offered to the FBI.
The paperwork point out that a number of the leaks could have been laundered by means of a “cut-out” who occurred to be the husband of a Schiff loyalist on the Democratic workers of the Home Intelligence Committee. The husband, then a reporter for the Baltimore Solar, knew Nakashima from their days working collectively on the Submit.
Although their names are hidden beneath redactions, federal authorities confirmed that the previous Schiff staffer who allegedly divulged the knowledge is Rheanne Wirkkala, and the “cut-out” is her husband Ian Duncan, then a reporter for the Solar.
“(Wirkkala)’s partner has labored with Ellen Nakishima (sic) of the Washington Submit,” the FBI report states. “(Wirkkala) offered data to her husband who had brokered it out to different reporters,” together with allegedly Nakashima.
A Democrat donor, Wirkkala additionally helped Schiff prosecute the primary impeachment of Trump in 2019 as his deputy director of investigations.
In 2021, Wirkkala left the Home Intelligence Committee to take a high-level Pentagon publish within the Biden administration. She now works for Clarion Methods, a D.C.-based consulting agency co-founded by Julianne Smith, who seems in a just lately declassified intelligence report because the Hillary Clinton marketing campaign adviser who solicited Obama White Home officers for compromising materials on Trump and Russia in 2016. President Obama’s former Chief of Workers Denis McDonough is a principal within the agency.
Wirkkala didn’t reply to requests for remark. Her husband, Duncan, is now working on the Washington Submit.
Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Submit was a go-to reporter for intelligence leaks on Trump
The Washington Submit
Data additionally present that Nakashima was additionally speaking with former senior Senate Intelligence Committee staffer James Wolfe, who was investigated for leaking labeled supplies on Trump aide Web page and finally convicted of mendacity to FBI brokers about contacting Nakashima and different reporters.
From December 2015 to June 2017, Nakashima and Wolfe exchanged emails a minimum of 5 instances, in response to courtroom data. In a single alternate, Nakashima allegedly despatched Wolfe a code to make use of in an encrypted messaging software. In one other, she allegedly mentioned “acquiring the SSCI’s public Wi-Fi password.”
Throughout a March 2021 occasion addressing “Nationwide Safety Leaks” – the place she shared the stage with a primary driver of the Russiagate hoax, former CIA Director John Brennan – Nakashima dismissed complaints by media critics that she acts as a “stenographer” for the Intelligence group. “The general public has a wildly inaccurate view of how I as a nationwide safety reporter go about my job,” she stated on the symposium. “It’s not that I get a narrative as a result of somebody determined to leak it to me and hand it to me on a silver platter.”
In a current assertion, Submit Govt Editor Matt Murray defended the veteran reporter’s integrity, asserting: “For 3 a long time, Ellen Nakashima has been one of the cautious, fair-minded, and extremely regarded reporters protecting nationwide safety.”
Nonetheless, a former Washington Submit colleague of Nakashima stated that, like many reporters who gained Pulitzers for his or her Russiagate protection, she was too reliant on anti-Trump sources and is “too invested” within the fast-unraveling story now to look again and reassess it with recent eyes.
Noting that Nakashima has not cleared up the report by figuring out her sources within the intelligence group who fed her data that turned out to be unsuitable or deceptive, the previous senior Submit reporter stated Nakashima is defending them, at the same time as a few of them fall beneath legal investigation for his or her position in perpetuating an enormous fraud in opposition to the president.
“She’s operating interference (for them), and worrying about her personal reporting wanting unhealthy,” stated the Submit supply, who spoke on the situation of anonymity.
Cozy Relationship
A equally cozy relationship was cast between Michael Schmidt of the New York Instances and Columbia College legislation professor Daniel Richman, a detailed buddy of Comey. After Trump fired Comey in 2017, the FBI paperwork notice, “Comey used Richman as a conduit to convey to the media memoranda of his conferences with President Trump,” which have been labeled.
A buddy of former FBI Director James Comey stated he was “fairly positive” he hadn’t given labeled data to NY Instances reporter Michael Schmidt.
The newly launched FBI memos reveal that Schmidt, who’s married to anti-Trump MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace, spent appreciable time with Richman, who was later investigated for leaking labeled materials to Schmidt. Richman advised the FBI he spoke to journalists “to appropriate tales vital of Comey, (and) the FBI and to form future press protection.” Richman advised brokers “he didn’t know who gave Schmidt the labeled data,” however he was “fairly positive” it wasn’t him, earlier than hedging that he was positive “with a reduction.” He additionally claimed Comey “by no means requested” him to speak to the media.
Like Nakashima, Schmidt credulously reported each angle of the Russiagate investigation regardless of the paucity of “collusion” proof.
A kind of Instances tales, “Comey Tried to Protect the F.B.I. From Politics. Then He Formed an Election,” turned the topic of a years-long leak investigation. The April 22, 2017, article gave a supposed insider account of how Comey dealt with the investigations of Clinton’s e mail scandal and Russiagate throughout the 2016 election. However it was clearly spun in Comey’s favor. “Partisanship was not a think about Mr. Comey’s method to the 2 investigations,” Schmidt wrote. “Within the case of Mr. Trump, he carried out the investigation by the ebook.” In actual fact, two unbiased investigations discovered severe misconduct in each probes.
FBI paperwork additionally reveal that former FBI officers Peter Strzok and Lisa Web page made three separate journeys to the New York Instances in 2017 earlier than the Schmidt article was printed – on March 10, March 30, and April 10 – to offer “investigator-level” briefings to Instances editors and reporters – all in regards to the identical flattering story about Comey. They mentioned labeled data throughout the briefings, the paperwork say.
Schmidt’s Might 2017 article, “Comey Memo Says Trump Requested Him to Finish Flynn Investigation,” helped strain the appointment of Particular Counsel Robert Mueller to take over the Russiagate case. Mueller targeted on potential obstruction, however ultimately discovered no proof for obstruction or collusion.
Nonetheless, Schmidt’s work was among the many newspaper’s 2018 Pulitzer-winning tales on Russiagate. The three-way friendship between Schmidt, his supply, and the topic of his story was not disclosed to the Pulitzer board – or the Instances readership. “Schmidt visited Richman’s home quite a few instances,” the FBI paperwork reveal.
A New York Instances spokeswoman, Danielle Rhoades-Ha, stated that the tales utilizing Richman as a supply “increase no issues in regards to the accuracy of The Instances’s reporting, which relied on a number of sources.” Requested in regards to the veracity of reporting about Comey allegedly conducting the Russiagate investigation “by the ebook,” the Instances didn’t reply.Richman was not charged with perjury or leaking labeled data. Neither was Comey, though he’s at the moment beneath investigation for potential false statements to Congress.
One other Trump-Russia conspiracy reporter, Shane Harris, additionally allegedly obtained labeled intelligence from Schiff’s committee when he labored for the Wall Avenue Journal.
Whistleblower Allegations
The FBI whistleblower claimed that inside 24 hours of Democratic Home intelligence panel member Eric Swalwell receiving a CIA doc, a number of the data in it confirmed up “virtually verbatim” in a July 1, 2017, article by Harris that referred to “Russian hackers.” Revealed beneath the headline, “GOP Activist Who Sought Clinton Emails Cited Trump Marketing campaign Officers,” the story by Harris and several other colleagues cited as sources, “U.S. officers with information of the intelligence.”
“(CIA) officers descended upon HPSCI’s places of work, threatening to cease offering data except the leaking ended,” recounted the FBI’s abstract of the whistleblower interview.
An FBI whistleblower claimed Rep. Eric Swalwell leaked a CIA doc to the press.
Enterprise Wire
The committee whistleblower suspected Swalwell “performed a job within the leak,” noting the California Democrat “beforehand had been warned to watch out as a result of he had a fame for leaking labeled data.” An outspoken Trump critic, Swalwell has denied being the supply of leaks.
Shane Harris, who later jumped to the Washington Submit earlier than just lately touchdown at The Atlantic, didn’t reply to requests for remark.
FBI investigators wrote that the committee whistleblower “suggested it’s possible the leaks are being carried out by means of cutouts.” They added, “He believed some people could also be utilizing their partner’s telephones to contact the media” and “conceal” their leaks.
Considered one of these people was believed to be Schiff’s workers director, Michael Bahar, a Democrat and former Obama adviser who led the committee’s Russiagate investigation and have become the FBI’s prime suspect in its leak investigation.
Throughout a February 2017 committee assembly, the whistleblower advised FBI brokers that Bahar “instructed the workers to gather data from the USIC (U.S. Intelligence Group) for functions of constructing it public.”
After Bahar left the committee in June 2017, the whistleblower alleged, he continued to leak data he obtained from a protege he positioned on the panel to “relay” labeled materials. Whereas the protege’s identify is hidden beneath redactions, authorities confirmed the staffer is Thomas Keen.
“(Keen) functioned as (Bahar’s) insider on the committee,” in response to an FBI report, regardless that “committee guidelines prohibited communications with former staffers on official issues.”
“He (Keen) tells (Bahar) what he realized and (Bahar) takes it to the media,” the whistleblower alleged in an August 2017 FBI interview.
No prices have been filed in opposition to both Keen or Bahar, who didn’t reply to requests for remark.
Ineffective Investigations
Declassified paperwork present that the FBI and DOJ launched no fewer than seven labeled leak investigations that centered on 2017 reporting on the Russiagate investigation. They focused a number of high-ranking Obama officers, two Democratic members of Congress – Schiff and Swalwell – and greater than three dozen Hill staffers from each events (together with now-FBI Director Kash Patel, then a Home intel lawyer for chairman Devin Nunes), together with quite a few journalists who have been on the receiving finish of the leaks.
Not one of the probes led to a single prosecution for espionage or mishandling secrets and techniques.
Critics say the investigations – carried out beneath the management of Comey’s deputy Andrew McCabe, who was himself investigated by DOJ’s IG for leaking labeled data to the media – have been botched, possible on function.
“There hasn’t been almost sufficient transparency on why these investigations didn’t lead to any accountability for these accountable,” stated Jason Foster, a former Republican staffer who served as chief investigative counsel to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley. Foster stated DOJ subpoenaed his private telephone and e mail data whereas he labored on the Hill in 2017.
Seizing the communications data of suspected leakers and journalists was essential to figuring out the sources of the leaks within the huge conspiracy in opposition to Trump. However of their search warrants, investigators failed to incorporate among the many data they sought the deleted texts from the encrypted Sign app utilized by reporters and leakers, which they might have obtained by seizing cell telephones.
And the phone data they did acquire included solely the telephone numbers of the calls made to and from the focused gadget over the required time interval, and the period of the calls, however excluded what was texted in these telephone calls. What’s extra, the emails taken included simply the metadata, not the content material of the messages. The warrants lined solely “non content material communication data.”
Additionally, “the federal government didn’t search native and long-distance phone data for the 2 members of Congress” – Schiff and Swalwell, in response to a December 2024 evaluation of the FBI’s investigative efforts by former Justice Division Inspector Normal Michael Horowitz. “The obligatory course of didn’t search the content material of any (of their) communications.”
Within the Nakashima probe, brokers oddly restricted their search of her telephone data to the interval from April 15, 2017, to July 31, 2017, which meant that any contacts with Home or Senate intel leakers previous to her April 11, 2017, story on the Web page FISA warrants wouldn’t have been found. Extra curious, investigators by no means obtained any data from her work e mail accounts, regardless that the courtroom authorized such searches.
Brokers additionally didn’t acquire even the logs of the Google emails of Schmidt and three different New York Instances reporters of their investigations of labeled leaks to the Instances in 2017, regardless that a choose approved giving investigators entry to the info.
The IG report stated allegations from the “committee witness” – believed to be Minehart – “weren’t finally substantiated.” Nonetheless, brokers didn’t pursue the telephone data for a number of the spouses whose telephones have been utilized by staffers he accused of leaking. They usually by no means sought any of the telephone data for a further staffer ID’d by Minehart.
And whereas investigators targeted on former Schiff workers director and normal counsel Bahar as a primary leak suspect, they didn’t acquire any of his emails whereas he served on the committee. The scope of their Google e mail search started after he left the Home in June 2017.
A Curious Declare
Declassified FBI memos recommend that the bureau’s investigation was blunted by an unnamed Home Intelligence Committee lawyer who superior the curious declare that each members and congressional aides had immunity from legal prosecution beneath the Structure’s “speech or debate clause.”
The investigators’ deference to this novel notion apparently hampered the efforts of Bahar, who visited the “learn room” with the labeled materials in early 2017 and subsequently made contact by telephone with Nakashima and different Submit reporters who authored the articles that disclosed labeled data, in response to the IG report.
“To keep away from gathering data that might be protected by the Speech or Debate Clause, the Google search warrant sought data starting on the date the Senior Committee Staffer (Bahar) departed from authorities service,” the IG report stated.
Investigators additionally restricted what Apple telephone data of Bahar they might use as proof by making use of “filter procedures to evaluation the contents of the search warrant returns to segregate Speech or Debate materials and attorney-client privileged materials,” the report stated.
In his report, then-DOJ IG Horowitz stated that brokers and prosecutors “finally decided that (Bahar) possible didn’t leak the labeled data to the reporters and the investigation was closed with none prices being filed.” The IG report stated that the search warrant software for Bahar’s data famous that the “Committee Witness” — Minehart — was of “unknown reliability.”
FBI paperwork point out the New York Instances leak investigation was opened by Joseph Pientka, the supervisory particular agent who initially ran the Russiagate probe in opposition to Trump out of bureau headquarters. And the leak probe was overseen by DOJ official David Laufman, the Obama appointee and Democratic Social gathering marketing campaign donor who charged a number of Trump advisers beneath the Overseas Brokers Registration Act.
Although the statute of limitations could also be near expiring, federal legislation enforcement sources say FBI Director Patel is contemplating reopening the leak investigations. The statutory clock for prosecuting the federal offense of exposing labeled data runs ten years. And there’s no interval of limitation for prosecuting espionage circumstances.
The proof gathered from the investigations has not been destroyed, in response to the IG report. Digital copies of the communications data obtained are saved within the FBI’s case administration system, generally known as Sentinel, and laborious copies are retained in a locked submitting cupboard.
Media Collusion
DNI Tulsi Gabbard has primarily reopened the Russiagate probe by declassifying tons of of pages of once-hidden paperwork.
AP
Since Director of Nationwide Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard primarily reopened the Russiagate story by declassifying tons of of pages of paperwork exposing how Obama administration intelligence was manufactured in opposition to Trump, the Washington Submit and different main media have largely refused to report the story they as soon as lined zealously.
They’ve even blacked out the claims of a former prime ODNI cyber-analyst who stated he was “pressured” to vary his assessments about Russian election affect to suit the anti-Trump narrative.
“The identical media that breathlessly reported each unverified declare within the Steele file now calls for ‘context’ and ‘corroboration’ when confronted with damning major paperwork,” stated Peter Flaherty, chairman of the Nationwide Authorized and Coverage Heart in Washington. “This double customary – embracing unverified gossip when it fits their narrative however dismissing laborious proof when it doesn’t – reveals a media extra eager about defending Democratic allies than pursuing reality.”
For her half, Nakashima has educated her investigative sights on Gabbard, who claims the Submit reporter has been “stalking” and “harassing” her and her workers, whereas calling intelligence officers from a “burner telephone” to disguise her id whereas attempting to entice them into sharing derogatory details about Gabbard.
Some New York Instances and Washington Submit alumni who’ve gained Pulitzers protecting earlier nationwide safety points say they’re disillusioned their former colleagues aren’t doing extra to cowl the declassification of Intelligence Group paperwork strongly suggesting the Trump-Russia “collusion” scandal was cooked up for political causes.
“The paperwork that got here out prior to now couple of months are jaw-dropping. It’s uncommon to see such slam-dunk proof of a conspiracy,” stated former Washington Submit investigative reporter Susan Schmidt. “However the whole mainstream media have been working from an anti-Trump agenda, and they aren’t reporting on the exposé of the hoax that’s popping out.”
Former New York Instances Pulitzer winner Jeff Gerth agreed: “The media aren’t on the lookout for Russiagate (hoax) scoops, nor will they pretty current those others get in the event that they mirror poorly on their prior reporting.”
“They’re in a defensive posture and aren’t inclined to report deeply on something that helps Trump,” he defined.
Tim Graham stated the discharge of FBI leak data proves the actual scandal was by no means Russia collusion however “media collusion” – the collaboration between legacy media journalists with federal authorities malcontents who shared a standard objective of knee-capping Trump.
Although declassified paperwork expose their incestuous ties, Graham added, “these journalists nonetheless shamelessly faux they didn’t collude with their fellow liberals at authorities companies to undermine their home enemy Trump at each flip.”
