J.Okay. Rowling’s supporters steadily declare the writer has by no means truly mentioned or carried out something transphobic. It’s a place you possibly can see on social media, within the pages of the New York Instances, and even on a 2023 podcast with Rowling herself.
It’s additionally an simply debunked lie.
A few of this confusion round Rowling’s opinions might be cleared up with a definition of transphobia, which doesn’t — regardless of the “phobia” — solely imply concern of trans folks, however, per Merriam-Webster, additionally an “irrational concern of, aversion to, or discrimination in opposition to transgender folks.” (In truth, Merriam-Webster’s personal examples listing cites a number of articles associated to Rowling.) Rowling can say she likes everybody, however she has displayed that prejudice repeatedly. She’s additionally peddled specific concern of trans folks, significantly trans girls, insisting they’re an inherently harmful risk to cisgender girls.
Though some in the media distort the anger directed at Rowling from trans activists, trans folks, and allies, the reality is these emotions — not simply anger, however betrayal and grief — are justified. Rowling has made her antagonistic place on trans points clear via tweets, sound bites, actions, and even a 3,600-word weblog submit. By 2025, her transphobia has grow to be so rampant and fixed that it’s troublesome to construct a very complete timeline of it. For these attuned to it, she doesn’t need to spell it out each single time; it’s an enormous a part of her identification.
These canine whistles solely result in extra confusion, permitting folks to level to the absence of instantly apparent bigotry to say she’s being unfairly maligned. Over time, nonetheless, that bigotry has not solely grown extra pronounced but in addition broader in scope, main her to not too long ago goal not solely trans folks but in addition asexual folks. Moreover, she more and more threatens detractors with authorized motion, which contributes to critics of her conduct falling silent. Conspicuously, a lot of her authorized threats look like directed at people figuring out as a part of the LGBTQ+ neighborhood.
Since Rowling started airing her views, her neighborhood, particularly on-line the place many of those conversations are had, is now stacked with equally minded individuals who share her transphobic beliefs. As an illustration, Rowling is associates with quite a few anti-trans activists, together with Helen Joyce, who’s made alarmingly transphobic statements calling for a “discount” within the variety of trans folks. She’s tweeted public help for anti-gay, anti-trans activist Caroline Farrow. These connections are a part of a social community echo chamber of trans-exclusionary radical feminists, or TERFs (generally known as “radfems” or the “gender-critical” motion). In Rowling’s native UK, TERFism has gained a singular stronghold over some significantly vocal, ostensibly liberal feminists like Rowling. Her strident transphobia has additionally led her to align herself with far-right extremists.
The details we are able to simply level to counsel that Rowling has been turning towards an anti-trans stance over an extended interval, starting principally with easy engagement on social media and resulting in fiery and extremist statements. Whereas labeling one thing transphobic is a severe accusation, and never one thing we do flippantly, it’s vital to acknowledge Rowling’s bigotry for what it’s. The rundown that follows reveals her rising embrace of transphobic, even extremist rhetoric.
2014: Rowling writes The Silkworm, the second novel within the Cormoran Strike thriller collection, which entails a trans lady who’s portrayed as conspicuous and unable to move. The e book features a scene the place the principle character gleefully threatens this character with jail rape.
October 2017: Rowling “likes” a tweet linking to a controversial, since-deleted Medium article referring to a theoretical trans lady in a feminine area as “a stranger with a penis.” Whereas liking a tweet may appear small, that is notable as a result of the piece made the essential argument Rowling continues to make in the present day, particularly that trans girls are by default a part of a “male-bodied” group who’re harmful to girls and who shouldn’t have entry to girls’s bogs. Within the public sphere, this kicks off questions on whether or not Rowling is anti-trans, that are adopted by the writer entrenching additional.
2018: In March, Rowling “likes” (after which unlikes) a tweet referring to trans girls as “males in attire” and implying that trans rights are “misogyny.” A JKR spokesperson later claims that this “like” was an accident and that Rowling was having “a middle-aged second.”
In September, Rowling “likes” a tweet linking to an opinion column by recognized TERF Janice Turner, which argues but once more that trans girls are inherently sexual predators, referring to them as “fox(es) in a henhouse … determine(ing) as (hens).” The parable that trans girls are a hazard to cis girls is a grossly transphobic stereotype with nearly no real-world justification, however Rowling pins most of her anti-trans arguments on it, utilizing her expertise as a survivor of home abuse to justify her prejudice.
December 2019: In a shift towards brazenly voicing her anti-trans sentiments, Rowling vocally helps the plaintiff of an employment discrimination go well with within the UK. Maya Forstater turned a trigger célèbre within the TERF neighborhood after suing the corporate that selected to not renew her contract. In 2018, Forstater posted quite a few anti-trans tweets, each generalizing about trans folks and instantly focusing on one nonbinary particular person. The tweets made employees members at her firm uncomfortable, and finally, in March 2019, the group declined to resume Forstater’s contract. Rowling’s tweet, during which she distorts trans identification and the details of the case, marks the primary time many individuals grow to be conscious of her rising transphobic tendencies.
June 2020: In a tweet, Rowling mocks the trans-inclusive phrase “individuals who menstruate” in an article about pandemic menstrual well being, implying that the phrase, meant to embody trans males and nonbinary folks, erases, overrides, or obscures the phrase “girls.”
In a follow-up to the earlier tweet and the backlash it spawned, Rowling posts a thread implying that trans activists are “erasing the idea of (organic) intercourse” and together with it “the lived actuality of ladies.” She additionally states, “I’d march with you when you have been discriminated in opposition to on the premise of being trans.” (Up to now, she has not.)
Days later, Rowling produces her most overt and prolonged dialogue of her views, a 3,600-word manifesto printed on her web site responding to “the brand new trans activism.” The submit is replete with myths and false transphobic stereotypes, significantly revolving across the narratives that gender and biology are inextricable and that trans girls are harmful. Rowling states the motion provides “cowl to predators”. She additionally repeatedly amplifies the alarmist, false concept that teenagers are transitioning as a part of a social media development, a declare primarily based on a handful of inaccurate and shady scientific research claiming that an outsize variety of trans teenagers will detransition later, research which have since been extensively debunked.
August 2020: After the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights group points an announcement repudiating her transphobia, Rowling doubles down on her place and returns an award given to her by the org in 2019.
September 2020: Rowling releases the Cormoran Strike e book Troubled Blood and is extensively criticized after she creates a villain who preys on girls by sporting girls’s garments. That is precisely the specter of a sexual predator that Rowling believes hides behind the label of “trans lady.”
Trans rights banners name out J.Okay. Rowling throughout anti-government protests in Bangkok, Thailand. Lauren DeCicca/Getty Photos
December 2020: In an interview with Good Housekeeping, Rowling claims that “90 %” of Harry Potter followers secretly agree together with her anti-trans views, however that “many are afraid to talk up as a result of they concern for his or her jobs and even for his or her private security.” This as soon as once more stereotypes trans activists as an indignant, entitled, and harsh mob.
July 2021: Rowling tweets a screenshot of a tiny account — reportedly with round 200 followers on the time — of a self-identified trans consumer who mentions her in a tweet discussing gender identification. Since Rowling didn’t take away the trans consumer’s data within the screenshot that went out to her 14 million followers, that consumer is subsequently inundated with transphobic harassment and finally deletes their Twitter account.
November 2021: Rowling publicizes {that a} group of three trans folks shared a photograph of themselves holding protest indicators exterior of her home, saying that she had known as the police out of alarm (a reality Scottish police additionally verified). Rowling claims that these protesters had “doxxed” her, and the media runs with this report, which performs into the bigger evolving media narrative of Rowling as a sufferer of trans harassment. However as many individuals have identified, Rowling’s handle is publicly recognized — so well-known, actually, that it’s a frequent fan tour cease. Police later formally state there may be “no criminality” in what the trans protesters had carried out.
As trans tradition vlogger Jessie Earl factors out, trans folks themselves are at a lot greater danger of experiencing doxxing, bullying, and harassment than cisgender folks. Earl additionally notes that Rowling has supported and platformed (via Twitter likes, follows, and retweets) a number of TERFs who had themselves doxxed different folks, together with Marion Millar, who confronted felony fees for homophobically doxxing a police officer (although these fees have been dropped pending overview); Rosie Duffield, an MP who drew criticism for “publicly outing” a employees member who resigned over her transphobia; and Rosa Freedman, a professor who doxxed a pupil who emailed her requesting a chat about her views on trans equality.
“Warfare is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Power. The Penised Particular person Who Raped You Is a Girl.”
December 2021: Rowling shares a Sunday Instances article that mocks the Scottish police for recognizing transgender identification. In her tweet, she parodies 1984, writing, “Warfare is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Power. The Penised Particular person Who Raped You Is a Girl.”
Later that month, in the course of a thread ostensibly trying to help trans equality, Rowling tweets, “The query on the coronary heart of this debate is whether or not intercourse or gender identification ought to kind the premise of choices on safeguarding, provision of companies, sporting classes and different areas the place girls and ladies at the moment have authorized rights and protections.” The concept behind what Rowling is saying is that permitting trans girls equal entry to these areas will erode present authorized rights for cisgender girls and ladies. This can be a place that solely is sensible in case you are denying that trans girls and ladies are girls and ladies. Rowling then provides an insistence on separating “intercourse” from “gender,” an essentialist concept that contradicts present medical apply and scientific analysis, which advocates for treating gender identification as linked primarily to the mind, not anatomy.
March 2022: In response to a since-deleted tweet (which was itself a reply to a tweet during which Rowling implied trans girls have been “predators”), Rowling tweets about a sexual assault dedicated by a trans lady, utilizing this single incident to indicate that every one trans girls needs to be denied entry to public areas designated for girls.
The subsequent day, on Worldwide Ladies’s Day, Rowling posts a collection of tweets maligning gender-inclusive language and mockingly referencing Voldemort by sarcastically opining that the day in future could be often called “She Who Should Not Be Named Day.” She additionally explicitly criticizes gender-inclusive laws.
Later that month, British lawyer Alison Bailey partially wins an employment discrimination lawsuit during which she claimed that she was discriminated in opposition to due to her gender-essentialist views. Whereas the lawsuit was in progress, Rowling posted a tweet urging her followers to financially help Bailey.
August 2022: Rowling’s newest Cormoran Strike e book, The Ink Black Coronary heart, as soon as once more comes beneath hearth for transphobia due to its depiction of a personality broadly viewable as a satirical stand-in for Rowling herself — an anti-trans public determine who’s “canceled” by the web on trumped-up fees of transphobia after which killed.
December 2022: Rowling screencaps a thread in regards to the controversial new Hogwarts Legacy online game by the aforementioned widespread transgender YouTuber Jessie Earl, aka Jessie Gender. Earl factors out that supporting the franchise would “justify her continued focusing on of trans folks”; Rowling, in response, sarcastically accuses Earl of practising “purethink,” implying trans advocacy is a kind of non secular dogma. An onslaught of transphobic social media harassment focusing on Earl follows.
This month, Rowling additionally personally funds a brand new home violence help middle in Edinburgh, Scotland, which explicitly excludes trans girls; Rowling frames this new middle as providing “women-centered and women-delivered care.” Edinburgh’s longstanding home violence help middle has had a trans lady as its director since 2021. Trans girls, particularly girls of shade, are at a vastly greater danger of experiencing home violence and sexual assault than cisgender girls.
January 2023: Rowling posts that she is “Deeply amused by these telling me I’ve misplaced their admiration as a result of disrespect I present violent, duplicitous rapists.” Probably the most rapid context for this remark is presumably each the backlash to Hogwarts Legacy and the continued backlash over Rowling’s views writ massive concerning trans girls being harmful predators. So an affordable implication of Rowling’s phrases appears to be that she considers trans girls, by default, to be “violent, duplicitous rapists.”
March 2023: A new podcast, The Witch Trials of J.Okay. Rowling, produced by Bari Weiss’s the Free Press and hosted by outstanding former Westboro Baptist Church member Megan Phelps-Roper, featured interviews with Rowling. In its fifth episode, Rowling begins discussing the trendy trans rights motion, calling it “a cultural motion that was intolerant in its strategies and questionable in its concepts” and insisting, “I imagine, completely, that there’s something harmful about this motion and that it have to be challenged.”
She then compares the motion to Loss of life Eaters — the villainous supremacists in her books, analogous to Nazis:
(S)ome of you haven’t understood the books. The Loss of life Eaters claimed, “We now have been made to stay in secret, and now’s our time, and any who stand in our manner have to be destroyed. If you happen to disagree with us, you have to die.” They demonized and dehumanized those that weren’t like them.
I’m preventing what I see as a robust, insidious, misogynistic motion, that has gained big buy in very influential areas of society. I don’t see this explicit motion as both benign or powerless, so I’m afraid I stand with the ladies who’re preventing to be heard in opposition to threats of lack of livelihood and threats to their security.
Whereas Rowling can say she solely intends to focus on the particular trans activists who’re indignant at her, that’s an unattainable distinction. She doesn’t point out any formal group or entity that represents trans rights that has acted in opposition to her. The one context now we have for what she is responding to are non-affiliated people on Twitter sending indignant messages in response to her transphobic feedback. Certainly, the episode is titled “The Tweets” and options Phelps-Roper studying indignant and unhappy tweets from former followers of Rowling. This generalization doesn’t distinguish “the motion” from people who find themselves merely indignant and upset with Rowling. As an alternative, it appears to indicate that “good” trans persons are those who settle for Rowling’s model of their identification and permit her viewpoint — that they aren’t who they are saying they’re — to dominate their combat for social acceptance.
Trans persons are estimated to comprise about half a % of populations in each the US and the UK. A 2018 research from UCLA discovered no proof to help that anti-trans laws makes designated public areas safer, however did discover that “experiences of privateness and security violations in these locations are exceedingly uncommon.” In essence, there was no hazard to start with.
February 2024: Rowling donated 70,000 kilos (about $90,000) to an anti-trans Scottish political foyer campaigning to limit the Scottish authorities’s definition of “girls” to cisgender girls solely.
March 2024: On March 13, Rowling seems to disclaim on X (previously Twitter) that trans folks have been focused through the Holocaust. This all began when Rowling reposted a submit by James Esses about having been “canceled.” Esses is a blogger and former pupil who was fired from his counseling job and expelled from his remedy diploma program for his anti-trans campaigning.
Esses’s submit claimed he was fired for opposing the usage of puberty blockers for trans kids. Within the threads of Esses’s submit, in response to considered one of his supporters but in addition copying each Esses and Rowling, a consumer responded with, “The Nazis burnt books on trans healthcare and analysis, why are you so determined to uphold their ideology round gender?”
Rowling then takes this submit and screencaps it, asking, “I simply… how? How did you sort this out and press ship with out pondering ‘I ought to perhaps test my supply for this, as a result of it’d’ve been a fever dream’?”
The literal burning by Nazis of books and analysis from Berlin’s pioneering Institute for Sexual Analysis, which carried out the world’s first gender-affirming surgical procedures for trans folks, was captured in German newsreels on the time and has been well-documented since, together with by the UK’s personal Holocaust Memorial Day Belief. Calling this very well-sourced historical past a “fever dream” shortly drew important backlash from X customers, with many framing it as a type of Holocaust denial. When challenged on her declare with a number of sources by Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic teacher Alejandra Caraballo, Rowling first responds that the unique submit had made claims it didn’t say: that the Nazis burnt all analysis on trans well being care, and that trans folks have been the primary victims of the Nazis.
Rowling then doubles down on X by quote tweeting one other tweet claiming trans folks weren’t targets of the Nazis through the Holocaust. In her quote, Rowling frames the verified historical past of Nazi violence towards trans folks as “persistent claims.” She then, once more in response to Caraballo’s pushback in reply, makes an attempt to separate “trans-identifying folks” from “homosexual folks, who have been certainly victims of heinous remedy by the Nazis.”
Caraballo’s reply, which cited sources together with Scientific American, and a thorough accounting by a historian in regards to the methods trans folks confronted persecution beneath Nazi Germany, didn’t obtain a rejoinder from Rowling.
April 2024: On April 1, 2024, Rowling posted a thread on X pegged to the implementation of the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act, which added “threatening or abusive behaviour which is meant to fire up hatred” round a lot of identities, together with age, faith, and transgender identification to the hate crimes statute; the legislation doesn’t, considerably controversially, embrace hatred of ladies. In her posts, Rowling spotlit a lot of girls, from a handful of convicted or reported intercourse offenders to UN appointees Katie Neeves and Munroe Bergdorf in addition to Mridul Wadhwa, head of a Scottish rape disaster middle. The entire girls Rowling listed are reportedly trans — main the writer to write, “Clearly, the folks talked about within the above tweets aren’t girls in any respect, however males, each final considered one of them.” Rowling ended the thread with the hashtag #ArrestMe.
Might 2024: As a part of an X dialogue that started with Rowling intentionally misgendering a trans soccer supervisor, she doubled down in response to criticism, each by claiming that trans girls are “crossdressing straight males” and by evaluating trans identification to cultural appropriation.
“Do I get to be black if I like Motown and fancy myself in cornrows?” she wrote. “What if I declare the genuine me has all the time been black and that you simply’re being racist to me? Would that be OK, or would you discover it ludicrous and deeply offensive?” She didn’t reply to the various platform customers who replied to deal with her use of racist stereotypes or to level out that race, in contrast to gender, is a genetic identification.
August 2024: Rowling contributed to ongoing harassment of and assaults on Olympics boxer Imane Khelif, who was considered one of two feminine boxers disqualified by the Russian-led Worldwide Boxing Affiliation (IBA) from the 2023 World Championships after an unspecified biochemical take a look at. The take a look at detected elevated ranges of testosterone in Khelif’s system; whereas the particular motive for this result’s unconfirmed, cis girls can have elevated testosterone ranges attributable to pure variations in intercourse traits. Though Khelif is a lady and was assigned feminine at start, many extremists have used this obscure take a look at consequence to assault her with transphobic rhetoric, accusing her of being a person in disguise.
Each Khelif and the opposite IBA-disqualified athlete, Taiwan’s Lin Yu-ting, certified beneath the Worldwide Olympic Committee tips and have been accredited to compete within the Olympics. However following a dramatic match on August 1, during which Khelif’s opponent Angela Carini of Italy forfeited in beneath a minute after exchanging just some hits, Khelif as soon as once more got here beneath scrutiny from transphobes on the suspicion of secretly being a person. Among the many transphobic commentary she confronted was vitriol from J.Okay. Rowling, who tweeted a photograph of Khelif taking a look at Carini after Carini abruptly retired.
Carini, proven in tears within the photograph after withdrawing as Khelif appears to be like on, refused to shake Khelif’s hand after the match, which can have contributed to the idea she had been unfairly handled within the ring. She later mentioned to the BBC, nonetheless, that she wished to apologize to Khelif for not shaking her hand — an act Carini defined got here from anger at herself, not Khelif.
Rowling, nonetheless, noticed issues a lot otherwise. In her tweet, she framed the photograph as a misogynistic assault, writing, “The smirk of a male who’s is aware of he’s protected by a misogynist sporting institution having fun with the misery of a lady he’s simply punched within the head, and whose life’s ambition he’s simply shattered. #Paris2024”
Once more, Khelif was born feminine and has all the time been a cisgender lady. Rowling appears to be arguing that any hormone-related variance in any respect amongst girls — regardless of the thousands and thousands of ladies who’ve hormone imbalances — is sufficient to render them inauthentic or not “actual” girls. It’s an alarming improvement in her ongoing shift into excessive transphobic views.
It’s additionally deeply ironic. One of many factors Rowling first made in her prolonged 2020 manifesto was in regards to the want for cisgender girls to not really feel restricted by the confines of normative gender expression. “In the end a sexist world tries to throw on the female-bodied, it’s superb to not really feel pink, frilly and compliant inside your personal head,” she wrote, and later: “By no means have I seen girls denigrated and dehumanised to the extent they’re now.” But Rowling’s transphobia has progressed to such an extent that she has herself grow to be a denigrator of a cisgender lady and a reinforcer of “compliant” femininity in opposition to Khelif.
Khelif, who went on to win Olympic gold regardless of the harassment, reportedly filed a lawsuit alleging cyberbullying in opposition to Rowling (Elon Musk can also be named within the go well with). Shortly after the lawsuit turned public on August 13, Rowling went silent on X, resulting in hypothesis from many onlookers that she had pushed her transphobic narrative too far. On August 23, although, she once more appeared on the platform, spreading extra false and deceptive commentary on Khelif. Her first submit was a quote from a transphobic hit piece in opposition to Khelif by Colin Wright, the previous managing editor of the far-right web site Quillette. She then went on to repost one other transphobic assertion, this time criticizing a latest Australian court docket ruling that upheld the authorized rights of trans girls.
April 2025: On April 16, 2025, the UK supreme court docket delivered a serious ruling that explicitly denied trans girls safety from discrimination on the premise of gender. The choice was prompted by a lawsuit introduced by For Ladies Scotland; the transphobic group obtained a 70,000-pound ($93,000) donation from Rowling in 2024 to help them in funding the go well with. Two Scottish courts had rejected their arguments earlier than the case was appealed to the best court docket within the UK.
The five-judge court docket dominated unanimously that the definition of “girls” within the UK’s Equality Act applies solely to “organic” girls and doesn’t embrace trans girls, even when they’ve had their gender legally acknowledged. The ruling successfully sanctions the banning of trans girls from many public areas reserved for girls, similar to girls’s locker rooms, hospitals, home violence shelters, and bogs; it might additionally lead different companies meant for girls to disclaim entry to trans girls. After the information broke, Rowling posted on X an image of herself smoking a cigar open air and wrote, “I like it when a plan comes collectively.” The clear affect Rowling has had on the dialog round trans rights within the UK, in addition to her direct financial help of the lawsuit, has intensified calls from former followers to cease supporting Harry Potter-related initiatives.
Clarification, March 3, 2023, 12:15 pm ET: Up to date to make clear particulars of the character who’s “canceled” in The Ink Black Coronary heart.
Clarification, March 16, 2023, 3:20 pm ET: Up to date to make clear that Rowling’s remarks drew a comparability between the Loss of life Eaters and the trans rights “motion,” quite than trans folks.
Replace, April 18, 2025, 3:40 pm ET: This story, initially printed March 3, 2023, has been up to date a number of occasions, most not too long ago with Rowling’s profitable funding of a transphobic lawsuit to strip trans girls of safety from gender-based discrimination beneath UK legislation.
