The U.S. Supreme Court docket
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Pictures
conceal caption
toggle caption
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Pictures
The U.S. Supreme Court docket on Friday stated it might reargue Louisiana’s congressional redistricting plan in its subsequent time period, after this summer time.
At subject is the Louisiana legislature’s creation of a Black-majority congressional district. A bunch of voters sued, arguing that the state legislature had unconstitutionally relied on race in drawing new congressional district strains.
Louisiana’s inhabitants is roughly one-third Black. However after the 2020 Census, the state legislature drew new congressional district strains that supplied for just one majority-Black district in a state that has six congressional seats. That is the identical factor that Alabama did after the 2020 Census, solely to be slapped down by the Supreme Court docket two years in the past when a slim courtroom majority dominated that the state had illegally diluted the Black vote in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
Within the wake of that call, the Louisiana legislature, after dropping earlier than a number of courts, noticed the handwriting on the wall and drew a brand new map that supplied for a second majority-Black district. However in redrawing the district strains, the Republican-controlled legislature additionally sought to guard protected seats for 2 necessary GOP lawmakers, Speaker Mike Johnson and Majority Chief Steve Scalise.
Enter a bunch of voters figuring out themselves as “non-African-American voters,” who objected to the redistricting as a racial gerrymander.
In oral arguments earlier this 12 months, Louisiana’s lawyer instructed the excessive courtroom that merely was not the case. It was an old school political gerrymander, he stated, including, “We’re speaking concerning the Speaker of the Home. No rational state gambles with these high-stakes seats.”
